Al-Tamimi, N. A., & Fadzil, S. F. S. (2011). The potential of shading devices for temperature reduction in high-rise residential buildings in the tropics. Procedia Engineering, 21, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2015
Alhuwayil, W. K., Mujeebu, M. A., & Algarny, A. M. M. (2019). Impact of external shading strategy on energy performance of multi-story hotel building in hot-humid climate. Energy, 169, 1166–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.069
Bakirci, K. (2012). General models for optimum tilt angles of solar panels: Turkey case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6149–6159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.009
Benedikt, M. L., & Burnham, C. A. (1985). Perceiving architectural space: from optic rays to isovists, Persistence and Change Eds WH Warren, RE Shaw. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.  
Benghanem, M. (2011). Optimization of tilt angle for solar panel: Case study for Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy, 88(4), 1427–1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.001
Bhavani, R. G., & Khan, M. A. (2011). Advanced Lighting Simulation Tools for Daylighting Purpose: powerful features and related issues. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 6(4), 345-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/tasr.2011.345.363
Brown, F. (2003). The visibility graph: an approach to the analysis of traditional domestic M’zabite spaces. Space Syntax: 4th International Symposium. University College London, (vol.II, 56) 17-19.
Changlani, A. (2020). FACA-DE-LIT: Facade optimisation for visual comfort by controlled daylight distribution in high rise office buildings (Unpublished Master thesis in Architecture). Delft University of Technology.
Chi, D. A. (2022). Solar energy density as a benchmark to improve daylight availability and energy performance in buildings: A single metric for a single-objective optimization. Solar Energy, 234, 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.01.068
Christenson, M. (2010). Registering visual permeability in architecture: isovists and occlusion maps in AutoLISP. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1128–1136. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36076
Dawes, M. J., Ostwald, M. J., & Lee, J. H. (2021). Examining control, centrality and flexibility in Palladio’s villa plans using space syntax measurements. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.02.002
De Luca, F., Sepúlveda, A., & Varjas, T. (2022). Multi-performance optimization of static shading devices for glare, daylight, view and energy consideration. Building and Environment, 217, 109110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109110
Ding, Y., Xu, X., Wang, Z., Li, H., & Wang, W. (2014). The relation of infant attachment to attachment and cognitive and behavioural outcomes in early childhood. Early Human Development, 90(9), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.06.004
Doulos, L., Tsangrassoulis, A., & Topalis, F. (2008). Quantifying energy savings in daylight responsive systems: The role of dimming electronic ballasts. Energy and Buildings, 40(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.01.019
Dzebic, V. (2013). Isovist analysis as a tool for capturing responses towards the Built Environment. UWSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7511
ElBatran, R. M., & Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2021). Applying a parametric design approach for optimizing daylighting and visual comfort in office buildings. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3275–3284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.014
Eltaweel, A., Su, Y., Mandour, M. A., & Elrawy, O. O. (2021). A novel automated louver with parametrically-angled reflective slats; design evaluation for better practicality and daylighting uniformity. Journal of Building Engineering, 42, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102438
Franz, G., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Predicting experiential qualities of architecture by its spatial properties. 18th International Association for People-Environment Studies (IAPS 2004), 157–166. https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D4C1-5
Freewan, A. A. Y. (2014). Impact of external shading devices on thermal and daylighting performance of offices in hot climate regions. Solar Energy, 102, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.009
Haberl, J. S., & Bou-Saada, T. E. (1998). Procedures for calibrating hourly simulation models to measured building energy and environmental data. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 120(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2888069
Hien, W. N., Liping, W., Chandra, A. N., Pandey, A. R., & Xiaolin, W. (2005). Effects of double glazed facade on energy consumption, thermal comfort and condensation for a typical office building in Singapore. Energy and Buildings, 37(6), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.08.004
Iommi, M. (2019). Daylighting performances and visual comfort in Le Corbusier’s architecture. The daylighting analysis of seven unrealized residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 184, 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.014
Khidmat, R. P., Fukuda, H., Paramita, B., & Koerniawan, M. D. (2022a). The optimization of louvers shading devices and room orientation under three different sky conditions. Journal of Daylighting, 9(2), 137–149. https://dx.doi.org/10.15627/jd.2022.11
Khidmat, R. P., Fukuda, H., Paramita, B., Qingsong, M., & Hariyadi, A. (2022b). Investigation into the daylight performance of expanded-metal shading through parametric design and multi-objective optimisation in Japan. Journal of Building Engineering, 51, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104241
Kirimtat, A., Koyunbaba, B. K., Chatzikonstantinou, I., & Sariyildiz, S. (2016). Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020
Konis, K., & Lee, E. S. (2015). Measured daylighting potential of a static optical louver system under real sun and sky conditions. Building and Environment, 92, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.024
Kurian, C. P., Aithal, R. S., Bhat, J., & George, V. I. (2008). Robust control and optimisation of energy consumption in daylight—artificial light integrated schemes. Lighting Research & Technology, 40(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153507079511
Lakhdari, K., Sriti, L., & Painter, B. (2021). Parametric optimization of daylight, thermal and energy performance of middle school classrooms, case of hot and dry regions. Building and Environment, 204, 108173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108173
Lee, J. H., & Ostwald, M. J. (2020). Grammatical and Syntactical Approaches in Architecture: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1698-0
Loutzenhiser, P. G., Maxwell, G. M., & Manz, H. (2007). An empirical validation of the daylighting algorithms and associated interactions in building energy simulation programs using various shading devices and windows. Energy, 32(10), 1855–1870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2007.02.005
Meilinger, T., Franz, G., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2012). From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps toward closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(1), 48–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b34048t
Nikpour, M., Kandar, M. Z., & Mosavi, E. (2013). Investigating daylight quality using self-shading strategy in energy commission building in Malaysia. Indoor and Built Environment, 22(5), 822–835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12458512
Ostwald, M. J., & Dawes, M. (2013). Prospect-refuge patterns in Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairic houses: Using isovist fields to examine the evidence. The Journal of Space Syntax, 4(1), 136– 159. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1316624
Palarino, C., & Piderit, M. B. (2020). Optimisation of passive solar design strategies in side-lit offices: Maximising daylight penetration while reducing the risk of glare in different chilean climate contexts. Journal of Daylighting, 7(1), 107–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.15627/jd.2020.9
Poirazis, H., Blomsterberg, Å., & Wall, M. (2008). Energy simulations for glazed office buildings in Sweden. Energy and Buildings, 40(7), 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.011
Radhi, H., Eltrapolsi, A., & Sharples, S. (2009). Will energy regulations in the Gulf States make buildings more comfortable–a scoping study of residential buildings. Applied Energy, 86(12), 2531–2539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.003
Rafati, N., Hazbei, M., & Eicker, U. (2023). Louver configuration comparison in three Canadian cities utilizing NSGA-II. Building and Environment, 229, 109939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109939
Samiou, A. I., Doulos, L. T., & Zerefos, S. (2022). Daylighting and artificial lighting criteria that promote performance and optical comfort in preschool classrooms. Energy and Buildings, 258, 111819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111819
Shaeri, J., Yaghoubi, M., & Habibi, A. (2022). Effects of External Louvers on Solar Heat Gain and Energy Consumption of an Office Building in Different Climates of Iran. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 46(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40997-021-00449-x
Sreshthaputra, A., Haberl, J., & Andrews, M. J. (2004). Improving building design and operation of a Thai Buddhist temple. Energy and Buildings, 36(6), 481–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.12.010
Suziyana, M. D., Nina, S. N., Yusof, T. M., & Basirul, A. A. S. (2013). Analysis of heat gain in computer laboratory and excellent centre by using CLTD/CLF/SCL method. Procedia Engineering, 53, 655–664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.085
Task, I. E. A. (2000). Daylight in Buildings: a source book on daylighting systems and components. (LBNL-47493, Eds.). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Triantafyllidou, E. F., & Michael, A. G. (2020). The impact of installing a concave curved profile blind to a glass window for visual comfort in office buildings. Procedia Manufacturing, 44, 269–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.231
Tsikra, P., & Andreou, E. (2017). Investigation of the energy saving potential in existing school buildings in Greece. The role of shading and daylight strategies in visual comfort and energy saving. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 38, 204–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.107
Villalba, A. M., Alchapar, N. L., Correa, E. N., Pattini, A. E., & Santoni, L. (2018). Opto-thermal methods for evaluating building envelope materials and components: Situation in Argentina. Revista HABITAT SUSTENTABLE, 8(2), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2018.08.02.05
Wang, Y., Yang, W., & Wang, Q. (2022). Multi-objective parametric optimization of the composite external shading for the classroom based on lighting, energy consumption, and visual comfort. Energy and Buildings, 275, 112441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112441
Wiener, J. M., & Franz, G. (2004). Isovists as a means to predict spatial experience and behavior. International Conference on Spatial Cognition, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_3
Xiang, L., Papastefanou, G., & Ng, E. (2021). Isovist indicators as a means to relieve pedestrian psycho-physiological stress in Hong Kong. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 964–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320916768