باغ نظر

بررسی نیازها و ترجیحات زنان در فضای نیمه‌عمومی مجتمع‌‌های مسکونی بلندمرتبه

https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2025.482101.5681
دوره 22، شماره 142
فروردین 1404
صفحه 27-40
باغ نظر

نوع مقاله : مقالۀ پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سارا عنبری 1
سید عباس یزدانفر 2
سید هادی قدوسی‌‌فر 3
آزاده شاهچراغی 4

1 دانشجوی دکتری معماری، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار معماری، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

4 دانشیار معماری، دانشکدۀ عمران، معماری و هنر، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
بیان مسئله: بررسی مفهوم سبک زندگی به‌‌عنوان مجموعه‌‌ای کامل از فعالیت‌‌ها و الگوی زندگی افراد می‌‌تواند منجر به شناخت نیازها و ترجیحات ساکنان در برنامه‌‌ریزی فضایی و طراحی محیط‌‌های مسکونی شود. با توجه به این موضوع که نیمی از جمعیت هر جامعه‌‌ای را زنان تشکیل می‌‌دهند بررسی سبک زندگی آنان از آن جهت حائز اهمیت است که می‌‌تواند بینشی را در مورد روش‌‌هایی که محیط مسکونی ممکن است بر سلامت جسمی و روانی آنها تأثیر بگذارد، ارائه دهد و به کاهش نابرابری‌‌های مبتنی‌بر جنسیت و بهبود کیفیت زندگی آن‌‌ها کمک کند. بااین‌‌حال بررسی رفتارهای مسکن مبتنی‌بر سبک زندگی زنان در ادبیات موضوع به‌‌ندرت بررسی شده است. 
هدف پژوهش: هدف از این پژوهش شناسایی نیازها و ترجیحات زنان در فضای نیمه‌عمومی مجتمع‌‌های مسکونی بلندمرتبه است که با توجه به سبک زندگی آنها تعیین می‌شود. 
روش پژوهش: مطالعۀ خودمردم‌نگاری به‌‌عنوان روش تحقیق انتخابی در پاسخ‌‌دهی به چیستی الگوی فعالیت زنان و شناخت ترجیحات آنان در محیط مسکونی در نظر گرفته شد و به‌‌منظور تحلیل داده‌های کیفی، متن گزارش‌‌ها کدگذاری شد و با روش تحلیل تماتیک مضامین اصلی استخراج شد. 
نتیجه‌گیری: این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که محدودیت فضا در واحدهای آپارتمانی و محدودیت در زمان و مکان استفاده از فضاهای عمومی خارج از ساختمان، بسیاری از فعالیت‌ها را با مشکل مواجه کرده است. در نتیجه اغلب زنان به‌دنبال محیط مسکونی هستند که بتواند از فعالیت‌‌های اجتماعی، فراغتی و کاری آنان پشتیبانی نماید. همچنین نیاز به مدیریت اشیا در فضا، مدیریت ازدحام و شلوغی، مدیریت تردد حیوانات خانگی و برخورداری از امکانات و تدابیر امنیتی از دیگر ترجیحات زنان بوده است. در نتیجه بهره‌گیری از فضای نیمه‌عمومی برای یکپارچه‌سازی زندگی روزمره و امتداد سبک زندگی در بیرون از واحد شخصی در کنار نقش ارتباطی فضای نیمه‌عمومی می‌‌تواند کیفیت زندگی در مجتمع‌‌های مسکونی را در سطوح مختلف ارتقا دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سبک زندگی زنان
ترجیحات مسکن
ترجیحات فضای نیمه‌عمومی
مجتمع‌‌های مسکونی بلندمرتبه
مجتمع‌‌های مسکونی محصور

عنوان مقاله English

Examining Women’s Needs and Preferences in the Semi-Public Spaces of High-Rise Gated Communities

نویسندگان English

Sara Anbari 1
Seyed Abbas Yazdanfar 2
Seyed Hadi Ghoddusi Far 3
Azadeh Shahcheraghi 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor in Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor in Architecture, Faculty of Civil, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Problem statement: Investigating the concept of lifestyle as a comprehensive set of activities and living patterns can provide insights into residents’ needs and preferences, informing spatial planning and residential design. Given that women comprise half of any society’s population, understanding their lifestyles is crucial, as it offers perspectives on how the residential environment may impact their physical and mental well-being, contributing to the reduction of gender-based inequalities and the enhancement of their quality of life. However, residential behaviors shaped by women’s lifestyles have rarely been explored in the literature.
Research objective: This study aims to identify women’s needs and preferences in the semi-public spaces of high-rise gated communities, considering their lifestyle patterns.
Research method: Autoethnography was chosen as the research method to explore women’s activity patterns and housing preferences. To analyze the qualitative data, reports were coded, and thematic analysis was employed to extract key themes.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that spatial limitations within apartment units, along with restrictions on time and place for utilizing public spaces outside the building, have created challenges for many activities. Consequently, most women seek a residential environment that supports their social, leisure, professional, and occupational activities. Additionally, key preferences include the management of objects in shared spaces, spatial density management and congestion control, regulation of pet movement, and access to security infrastructure and provisions. As a result, utilizing semi-public spaces to integrate daily life and extend lifestyle beyond the private unit—alongside their role as connective spaces—can enhance the quality of life in these communities at various levels.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Women’s lifestyle
  • Housing preferences
  • Semi-public space preferences
  • High-rise gated communities
  • Gated communities
عینی‌فر، علیرضا. (۱۳۸۴). محدودۀ مجتمع‌‌های مسکونی و تداوم کالبدی شهر، مطالعه موردی تهران. انبوه‌سازان مسکن، (۱۵)، ۲۸-۳۵.‎ https://www.sid.ir/paper/435335/fa 
Ærø, T. (2006). Residential choice from a lifestyle perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(2), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090600773139 
Akmal Farraz, M. A., Barus, L. S., Khoirunurrofik, & Adianto, J. (2021). Analysis of Gen Y lifestyle based on life cycle on housing preferences in Depok City. In S. S. Emamian, T. O. Adekunle, U. Nangkula, & M. Awang (Eds.), ICSDEMS 2019: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Design, Engineering, Management and Sciences (pp. 109-117). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3765-3_10 
Andersen, H. S. (2011). Motives for tenure choice during the life cycle: the importance of noneconomic factors and other housing preferences. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2010.522029 
Azizi, M. M., & Malek Mohammadnezhad, S. (2008). Comparative study on high-rise and conventional residential complexes: The cases of Nour (Seoul) and Eskan complexes in Tehran. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, (32), 27-38. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_18866.html 
Beamish, J. O., Carucci Goss, R., & Emmel, J. (2001). Lifestyle influences on housing preferences. Housing and Society, 28(1-2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2001.11430459 
Bee, A. S., & Im, L. P. (2016). The provision of vertical social pockets for better social interaction in high-rise living. Planning Malaysia, 14(4) , 163-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v14.i4.156 
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.  Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 
Chan, S. T. (2005). Communal sky gardens for high-rise residential buildings. World Sustainable Building Conference, Tokyo. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/COMMUNAL-SKY-GARDENS-FOR-HIGH-RISE-RESIDENTIAL-Chan/0ab156314273445bb4359e72e5c5893a93fcb670 
Darab, S., Hartman, Y., & Holdsworth, L. (2018). What women want: single older women and their housing preferences. Housing Studies, 33(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1359501 
de Jong, P. A., van Hattum, P., Rouwendal, J., & Brouwer, A. E. (2018). The older adult’doesn’t exist: using values to differentiate older adults in the Dutch housing market. Housing Studies, 33(7), 1014-1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1414158 
Devlin, A. S. (1994). Gender-role and housing preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(94)80058-8 
Ebrahimi, G., Soltanzadeh, H., & Keramati, G. (2017). The reflection of the West culture in the life style and the architecture of the houses in the late Qajar Dynasty in Hamadan. Bagh-e Nazar, 14(47), 29-38. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_45082.html 
Frenkel, A., Bendit, E., & Kaplan, S. (2013). Residential location choice of knowledge-workers: The role of amenities, workplace and lifestyle. Cities, 35, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.005 
Ghazizadeh, N. (2011). The impact of open space design in residential complexes on creating a sense of place attachment [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran]. UTDLibrary. https://encr.pw/Lrams 
Graff, C. L. (1982). Employment of women, suburbanization and house styles. Housing and Society, 9(2), 111–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08882746.1982.11429894 
GramHanssen, K., & BechDanielsen, C. (2004). House, home and identity from a consumption perspective. Housing, theory and society, 21(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090410025816 
Gürel, B., & Öztop, H. Ü. L. Y. A. (2014). Family Lifestyle and Housing Preferences during the Process of Globalization: The Case of Turkey. Journalism and Mass Communication, 4(12), 787-793. 
He, Y. (2018). Study of interior public spaces for the promotion of social interaction in high-rise residential buildings [Master’s thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology]. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Study-of-Interior-Public-Spaces-for-the-Promotion-He/ecc0a350bc4a3a79d40d89d6b688d2f34582367a 
Hooimeijer, P., & Schutjens, V. A. J. M. (1991). Changing life-styles and housing consumption: a longitudinal approach. Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment, 6(2), 143-158. https://www.researchgate.net
Jansen, S. J. (2012). What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices? Journal of Housing and the built Environment, 27, 273-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9270-0 
Jansen, S. J. (2014). Different values, different housing? Can underlying value orientations predict residential preference and choice? Housing, Theory and Society, 31(3), 254-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2013.867279 
Kalantari, A., & Taslimi Tehrani, R. (2014). Sociological and geographical differences of life style in Tehran. Sociological Review, 20(2), 187-208.  https://doi.org/10.22059/jsr.2014.56278 
Kam, K. J., Lim, A. S. H., Al-Obaidi, K. M., & Lim, T. S. (2018). Evaluating housing needs and preferences of generation Y in Malaysia. Planning Practice & Research, 33(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2018.1427413 
Kamelnia, H., & Karimani, F. (2019). Assessing users’ physical needs in high-rise residential building design: Case study: District 9 of Mashhad, Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(25), 137-148. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_85080.html 
KamiShirazi, S. M., Soltanzadeh, H., & Habib, F. (2018). The impact of lifestyle on spatial organization of residential architecture in Iran (Case study: Kitchen between years 1304-1357 SH). Women Studies, 9(24), 33-70.  https://womenstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3339.html?lang=en 
Karsten, L. (2006). Housing as a way of life: Towards an understanding of middle-class families’ preference for an urban residential location. Housing Studies, 22(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030601024630 
Kim, S. H., Kim, H. B., & Gon Kim, W. (2003). Impacts of senior citizens’ lifestyle on their choices of elderly housing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(3), 210-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760310472245 
Kim, S. K. (2006). The gated community: Residents’ crime experience and perception of safety behind gates and fences in the urban area. Texas A&M University.
Kwon, H. J., Lee, H. J., & Beamish, J. O. (2016). US boomers′ lifestyle and residential preferences for later life. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(2), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.255 
Lee, H., Yun-Je, Carucci Goss, R., & Beamish, J. O. (2007). Influence of Lifestyle on Housing Preferences of Multifamily Housing Residents. Housing and Society, 34(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2007.11430542 
Lufkin, S., Thomas, M., Kaufmann, V., & Rey, E. (2018). Linking spatial characteristics to residential lifestyles. Articulo – Journal of Urban Research, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3498 
Lum, S. W. M. (2011). Re-designing the apartment-high-rise through a child’s perspective [Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa]. Sementic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Re-Designing-the-Apartment-High-Rise-through-a-Lum/26e901a663b37443951c15475014d380c5d1187f 
March, L., & Lehrer, U. (2022). Common Areas, Common Causes: Public Space in High-Rise Buildings During Covid-19. Urban Planning, 7(4), 352-363. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5610 
Mehri, S., Soheili, J., & Zabihi, H. (2021). The effect of lifestyle on the separation of public areas from private areas used by women in Qajar aristocratic houses in Mazandaran. Women Studies, 12(38), 261-295. https://doi.org/10.30465/ws.2021.29725.2927 
Michelson, W., & Reed, P. (1970). The theoretical status and operational usage of lifestyle in environmental research [Research paper No. 36]. Center for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.
Mohammadzadeh, S., Soltanzadeh, H., & Dabagh, A. (2022). Reflection of gender and lifestyle in the houses of the Qajar period in Ardabil. Islamic Art Studies, 19(47), 524-545. https://www.sysislamicartjournal.ir/article_152760.html?lang=en 
Muhuri, S., & Basu, S. (2021). Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social cohesion of its residents: case study from Kolkata, India. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(2), 781-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09830-3 
NSW Department of Planing and Environment. (2015). Apartment design guide: Tools for improving the design of residential apartment development. A NSW Governmenr website. Retrieved from http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Policy-and-Legislation/Housing/Apartment-Design-Guide
Palicki, S. (2020). Housing preferences in various stages of the human life cycle. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 28(1), 91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/remav-2020-0008 
Peatross, F. D., & Hasell, M. J. (1992). Changing lives/changing spaces: An investigation of the relationships between gender orientation and behaviors, and spatial preferences in residential kitchens. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9(3), 239-257. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-11782-001 
Prihatmanti, R., & Taib, N. (2018). Multi-layer planting as a strategy of greening the transitional space in high-rise buildings: A review. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 126, No. 1, p. 012013). IOP Publishing. Multi-layer planting as a strategy of greening the transitional space in high-rise buildings: A review - IOPscience 
Rapoport, A. (2016). Pour une anthropologie de la maison [For an Anthropology of the Home]. Ketabkadeh Kasra. (Original work published 1972)
Rashidzadeh, E., & Habibi, F. (2020). Cultural analysis of space in Kurdish residential architecture; Case study: traditional houses in Mukrian (The city of Sardasht). Iranian-Islamic City Studies, 10(40), 17-31. https://iic.ihss.ac.ir/Article/13529 
Rostaei, S., Farokhi Someh, M., & Ghorbani, R. (2023). Research on residential lifestyles and urban residence patterns from the viewpoints of satisfaction, choice, and preference: Case study: Tabriz metropolis. Journal of Geography and Planning, 26(82), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2023.10866 
Salama, A. M. (2006). A lifestyle theories approach for affordable housing research in Saudi Arabia. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 11(1), 67-76. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk
Talebi, J., & Kalantari, I. (2016). Architectural design guide of residential high-rise buildings. Road, Housing & Urban Development Research Center.
Varmaghani, H., & Soltanzade, H. (2018). The role of gender and livelihood culture in forming house (Comparing the Qajar’s houses of Gilan and Bushehr). Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(23), 123-134. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_69624.html 
Yuhaniz, M., & Jusan, M. M. (2016). The role and activities of Malay housewives and their influence on housing design preferences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 720–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.233 
Zare Shahamati, M., Sahragard, N., & Yazdanfar, S. A. (2023). Recognition and classification of flexible housing indicators related to lifestyle (Case study: Tehran). Hoviatshahr, 17(53), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.30495/hoviatshahr.2022.66136.12191 
Zarrabi Alhosseini, M. (2021). Design strategies of domestic space to improve functional and emotional quality [Doctoral dissertation, Iran University of Science and Technology]. Information Science and Technology (IranDOC). https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/37698a01cd0c509e14c7619bb64b052c 
Zarrabi, M., Yazdanfar, S. A., & Hosseini, S. B. (2021a). Systematic Review of Research Trends in Lifestyle and Housing. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 11(4), 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.30495/IJAUD.2021.17398 
Zarrabi, M., Yazdanfar, S. A., & Hosseini, S. B. (2021b). COVID-19 and healthy home preferences: The case of apartment residents in Tehran. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 102021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102021 
Zarrabi, M., Yazdanfar, S. A., & Hosseini, S. B. (2022). Usage of lifestyle in housing studies: a systematic review paper. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37, 575-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09883-4 
Zhang, K. (2020). The correlation research between lifestyle changes and evolution of residential communities-Based on a survey of Shanghai, China. Architectural Research, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5659/AIKAR.2020.22.1.1  

صفحه اصلی

ارسال مقاله

تماس با ما