مرور نظام‌مند سامانه‌های سایه‌انداز در اقلیم‌های گوناگون چارچوبی چندمعیاره برای بهینه‌سازی انرژی و آسایش کاربران

دوره 22، شماره 147
شهریور 1404
صفحه 35-50

نوع مقاله : مقالۀ مروری

نویسندگان

گروه معماری، واحد بم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بم، ایران.

چکیده
بیان مسئله: در بسیاری از اقلیم‌های گرم، مرطوب و حتی معتدل، سازوکار کنترل تابش خورشیدی به معضلی پیچیده تبدیل شده است؛ زیرا سامانه‌های سایه‌انداز موجود اغلب صرفاً بر کاهش مصرف انرژی تمرکز دارند و دیگر ابعاد مانند آسایش بصری، انسجام معماری و رفتار کاربران نادیده گرفته می‌شوند. در نتیجه، اجرای راهکارهای سایه‌اندازی فاقد نگاه چندمعیاره، گاه به خروجی‌هایی ناکارآمد و عدم مقبولیت در محیط‌های واقعی منجر می‌شود.
هدف پژوهش: این مقاله با هدف پر کردن خلأ مذکور، به مرور نظام‌مند ۷۰ مطالعۀ منتخب می‌پردازد تا ضمن تبیین طبقه‌بندی جامع سامانه‌های سایه‌انداز برپایۀ اقلیم، فناوری، نوع بنا و ملاحظات کاربرمحور، چارچوبی یکپارچه برای انتخاب و طراحی بهینۀ این سامانه‌ها در شرایط متنوع اقلیمی ارائه دهد.
روش پژوهش: رویکرد پژوهش برپایۀ دستورالعمل‌های مرور نظام‌مند و تحلیل محتوای کیفی بنا شده است. در مرحلۀ گردآوری، مقالات معتبر بین سال‌های ۲۰۰۴ تا ۲۰۲۴ از پایگاه‌های علمی گزینش و از نظر نوع سایه‌انداز، روش‌شناسی، شاخص‌های عملکردی و بافت اقلیمی بررسی شدند. سپس برمبنای تحلیل تطبیقی، یک چارچوب چندمعیاره تدوین شد که شبیه‌سازی‌های انرژی، بهینه‌سازی پارامتریک، ارزیابی کاربرمحور و کالیبراسیون میدانی را ادغام می‌کند.
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها نشان داد که راهکارهای موفق سایه‌اندازی، عموماً آنهایی هستند که میان کاهش بار حرارتی، تأمین روشنایی مطلوب، رضایت کاربران و ملاحظات زیست‌محیطی تعادل ایجاد می‌کنند. چارچوب پیشنهادی، با درنظرگرفتن چرخه‌های بازخوردی طراحی، اجرا و ارزیابی، پاسخی پویا به تغییرات اقلیمی و نیازهای کاربران ارائه می‌دهد و می‌تواند در ارتقای معماری پایدار و انسان‌محور مؤثر واقع شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

A Systematic Review of Shading Systems Across Diverse Climates A Multi-Criteria Framework for Optimizing Energy Performance and User Comfort

نویسندگان English

Parastoo Torkzadeh Mahani
Mansour Nikpour
Mohsen Ghasemi
Department of Architecture, Bam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bam, Iran.
چکیده English

Problem statement: In many warm, humid, and even temperate climates, managing solar radiation has become an increasingly complex challenge. This is largely due to the fact that most existing shading systems are predominantly designed with a singular focus on reducing energy consumption, often overlooking critical dimensions such as visual comfort, architectural integration, and occupant behavior. Consequently, shading strategies that fail to adopt a multi-dimensional approach frequently yield suboptimal performance and encounter limited acceptance in real-world applications.
Research objective: This study addresses the aforementioned gap by conducting a systematic review of 70 selected scholarly works. The aim is twofold: to establish a comprehensive classification of shading systems based on climatic context, technological characteristics, building typology, and user-centric considerations; and to propose an integrated decision-making framework for the optimal selection and design of shading strategies tailored to varied climatic scenarios.
Research method: The research adopts a systematic review methodology, underpinned by qualitative content analysis. High-impact publications from 2004 to 2024 were curated from authoritative academic databases. These studies were critically assessed based on shading typologies, methodological approaches, performance metrics, and climate contexts. A comparative analysis was then employed to synthesize a multi-criteria framework that integrates energy simulations, parametric optimization, user-centered evaluation, and field calibration techniques.
Conclusion: and Conclusion: The findings reveal that successful shading interventions are those that balance thermal load reduction, adequate daylight provision, user satisfaction, and environmental considerations. The proposed framework emphasizes iterative feedback loops across design, implementation, and post-occupancy evaluation phases. This dynamic, climate-responsive model offers a robust tool for advancing sustainable, human-centered architectural practices.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Shading systems
  • Systematic review
  • Energy optimization
  • User comfort
  • Climate adaptation
AbdelAziz, F. M. F. A. (2016). Utilizing Genetic Algorithms and Parametric Design for Efficient Daylighting Performance in Educational Spaces [Doctoral dissertation, Ain Shams University].
Abdou, Y., Kim, Y. K., Abdou, A., & Anabtawi, R. (2022). Energy optimization for fenestration design: evidence-based retrofitting solution for office buildings in the UAE. Buildings, 12(10), 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101541
Aketouane, Z., Malha, M., Bruneau, D., Bah, A., Michel, B., Asbik, M., & Ansari, O. (2018). Energy savings potential by integrating Phase Change Material into hollow bricks: The case of Moroccan buildings. Building Simulation, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0457-5
Al Dakheel, J., & Tabet Aoul, K. (2017). Building Applications, opportunities and challenges of active shading systems: A state-of-the-art review. Energies, 10(10), 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101672
Al Touma, A., & Ouahrani, D. (2017). Shading and day-lighting controls energy savings in offices with fully-Glazed façades in hot climates. Energy and Buildings, 151, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.06.058
Alah Ahadi, A. (2022). Developing and optimizing of shading devices to improve daylight performance of glass and transparent domes. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 13(3), 328-348. https://www.sbt-durabi.org/articles/article/8Yjb/
Alhuwayil, W. K., Mujeebu, M. A., & Algarny, A. M. M. (2019). Impact of external shading strategy on energy performance of multi-story hotel building in hot-humid climate. Energy, 169, 1166-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.069
Ali, A. A. E. M. M. (2012). Using simulation for studying the influence of vertical shading devices on the thermal performance of residential buildings (Case study: New Assiut City). Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 3(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2012.02.001
Al-Masrani, S. M., & Al-Obaidi, K. M. (2019). Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies. Automation in Construction, 102, 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014Get rights and content
Al-Masrani, S. M., Al-Obaidi, K. M., Zalin, N. A., & Isma, M. A. (2018). Design optimisation of solar shading systems for tropical office buildings: Challenges and future trends. Solar Energy, 170, 849-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.047
Alsharif, R., Arashpour, M., Golafshani, E., Rashidi, A., & Li, H. (2023). Multi-objective optimization of shading devices using ensemble machine learning and orthogonal design of experiments. Energy and Buildings, 283(1), 112840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112840
Alsukkar, M., Hu, M., Eltaweel, A., & Su, Y. (2022). Daylighting performance improvements using of split louver with parametrically incremental slat angle control. Energy and Buildings, 274(6), 112444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112444
Al-Tamimi, N. A., & Fadzil, S. F. S. (2011). The potential of shading devices for temperature reduction in high-rise residential buildings in the tropics. Procedia Engineering, 21(3-4), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2015
Alwetaishi, M., Al-Khatri, H., Benjeddou, O., Shamseldin, A., Alsehli, M., Alghamdi, S., & Shrahily, R. (2021). An investigation of shading devices in a hot region: A case study in a school building. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3229-3239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.008
Amleh, D., Halawani, A., & Hussein, M. H. (2023). Simulation-Based Study for Healing environment in intensive care units: enhancing daylight and access to view, optimizing an ICU room in temperate climate, the case study of Palestine. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(2), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101868
Bedon, C., Zhang, X., Santos, F., Honfi, D., Kozłowski, M., Arrigoni, M., ... & Lange, D. (2018). Performance of structural glass facades under extreme loads–Design methods, existing research, current issues and trends. Construction and Building Materials, 163(5), 921-937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.153
Bellia, L., De Falco, F., & Minichiello, F. (2013). Effects of solar shading devices on energy requirements of standalone office buildings for Italian climates. Applied Thermal Engineering, 54(1), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.01.039
Bellia, L., Marino, C., Minichiello, F., & Pedace, A. (2014). An overview on solar shading systems for buildings. Energy Procedia, 62, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.392
Bessoudo, M., Tzempelikos, A., Athienitis, A. K., & Zmeureanu, R. (2010). Indoor thermal environmental conditions near glazed facades with shading devices–Part I: Experiments and building thermal model. Building and Environment, 45(11), 2506-2516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.05.013
Bhatia, A., Sangireddy, S. A. R., & Garg, V. (2019). An approach to calculate the equivalent solar heat gain coefficient of glass windows with fixed and dynamic shading in tropical climates. Journal of Building Engineering, 22, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.008
Buratti, C., Belloni, E., Merli, F., Mastoori, M., Sharifi, S. N., & Pignatta, G. (2022). Evaluating the impact of shading devices, glazing systems, and building orientation on the energy consumption in educational spaces. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012022
Cho, J., Yoo, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Viability of exterior shading devices for high-rise residential buildings: Case study for cooling energy saving and economic feasibility analysis. Energy and Buildings, 82, 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.092
Chou, D. C., Chang, C. S., & Chang, J. C. (2016). Energy conservation using solar collectors integrated with building louver shading devices. Applied Thermal Engineering, 93, 1282-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.09.014
Da Silva, F. T., & Veras, J. C. G. (2023). A design framework for a kinetic shading device system for building envelopes. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(5), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.05.010
Dabaj, B., Rahbar, M., & Fakhr, B. V. (2022). Impact of different shading devices on daylight performance and visual comfort of A four opening sides’ reading room in rasht. Journal of Daylighting, 9(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2022.7
Datta, G. (2001). Effect of fixed horizontal louver shading devices on thermal perfomance of building by TRNSYS simulation. Renewable energy, 23(3-4), 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00131-2
De Almeida Rocha, A. P., Reynoso-Meza, G., Oliveira, R. C., & Mendes, N. (2020). A pixel counting based method for designing shading devices in buildings considering energy efficiency, daylight use and fading protection. Applied energy, 262, 114497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114497
De Luca, F., Sepúlveda, A., & Varjas, T. (2022). Multi-performance optimization of static shading devices for glare, daylight, view and energy consideration. Building and Environment, 217, 109110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109110
Dubois, M. C. (2001). Impact of shading devices on daylight quality in offices. Simulations with Radiance.
Dutta, A., Samanta, A., & Neogi, S. (2017). Influence of orientation and the impact of external window shading on building thermal performance in tropical climate. Energy and Buildings, 139, 680-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.018
Edupuganti, S. R. (2013). Dynamic shading: an analysis [Master’s Thesis, University of Washington]. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/22868
Esfandiari, A. , Neshat Safavi, S. H. , Touran Poshti, F. , Majidihatkehlouei, S. , Haghani, M., & Hosseini, S. B. (2024). Enhancement of the Potential of Exterior Louvre Shadings for Internal Daylight Distribution and Space Visual Quality in Isfahan City, Iran. Bagh-e Nazar, 21(133), 5-20. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/bagh.2024.418024.5458
Esfandiari, A., & Shokri, E. (2023). Evaluation of Space Syntax Effect on Visual Quality and Daylight Indexes for the Interior Spaces of Residential Units in Isfahan City. Karafan Journal, 19(4), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2022.306315.1754
Evangelisti, L., Guattari, C., Asdrubali, F., & de Lieto Vollaro, R. (2020). An experimental investigation of the thermal performance of a building solar shading device. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 101089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101089
Evola, G., Gullo, F., & Marletta, L. (2017). The role of shading devices to improve thermal and visual comfort in existing glazed buildings. Energy Procedia, 134, 346-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.543
Farahmandfar, A., Gharehghani, A., & Saray, J. A. (2025). Towards net-zero energy buildings: Real-time monitoring, data-driven, and machine learning optimization. Energy Conversion and Management, 343, 120264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136477
Fouad, M. M., Shihata, L. A., & Mohamed, A. H. (2019). Modeling and analysis of Building Attached Photovoltaic Integrated Shading Systems (BAPVIS) aiming for zero energy buildings in hot regions. Journal of Building Engineering, 21, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.017
Freewan, A. A. (2014). Impact of external shading devices on thermal and daylighting performance of offices in hot climate regions. Solar Energy, 102, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.009
Gomes, M. G., Santos, A. J., & Calhau, M. (2022). Experimental study on the impact of double tilted Venetian blinds on indoor daylight conditions. Building and Environment, 225, 109675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109675
Hafez, F. S., Sa’di, B., Safa-Gamal, M., Taufiq-Yap, Y. H., Alrifaey, M., Seyedmahmoudian, M., ... & Mekhilef, S. (2023). Energy efficiency in sustainable buildings: a systematic review with taxonomy, challenges, motivations, methodological aspects, recommendations, and pathways for future research. Energy Strategy Reviews, 45, 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101013
Hamza, M., Adamu, M. B., Usman, A. J., & Usman, B. W. (2022). Evaluation of mixed-mode strategies in office buildings of the tropical savanna climate. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6372370
Hashemi, A. (2014). Daylighting and solar shading performances of an innovative automated reflective louvre system. Energy and Buildings, 82, 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.086
Heidari, A., Taghipour, M., & Yarmahmoodi, Z. (2021). The effect of fixed external shading devices on daylighting and thermal comfort in residential building. Journal of Daylighting, 8(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2021.15
Hoffmann, S., Lee, E. S., McNeil, A., Fernandes, L., Vidanovic, D., & Thanachareonkit, A. (2016). Balancing daylight, glare, and energy-efficiency goals: An evaluation of exterior coplanar shading systems using complex fenestration modeling tools. Energy and Buildings, 112, 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.009
Hong, X., Lin, J., Yang, X., Wang, S., & Shi, F. (2022). Comparative analysis of the daylight and building-energy performance of a double-skin facade system with multisectional shading devices of different control strategies. Journal of Energy Engineering, 148(3), 05022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000828
Ito, R., & Lee, S. (2024). Performance enhancement of photovoltaic integrated shading devices with flexible solar panel using multi-objective optimization. Applied Energy, 373, 123866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123866
Jiang, Y., Qi, Z., Ran, S., & Ma, Q. (2024). A study on the effect of dynamic photovoltaic shading devices on energy consumption and daylighting of an office building. Buildings, 14(3), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030596
Kalaimathy, K., Priya, R. S., Rajagopal, P., Pradeepa, C., & Senthil, R. (2023). Daylight performance analysis of a residential building in a tropical climate. Energy Nexus, 11, 100226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100226
Karlsen, L., Heiselberg, P., Bryn, I., & Johra, H. (2016). Solar shading control strategy for office buildings in cold climate. Energy and buildings, 118, 316-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2016.03.014
Keshtkar Ghalati, A., & Ahmadian, M. (2024). Effects of window and light shelve configurations on energy consumption and daylight illuminance in classrooms. Renewable Energy Research and Applications, 5(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.22044/rera.2023.12563.1194
Khidmat, R. P., Fukuda, H., Paramita, B., & Koerniawan, M. D. (2022). The optimization of louvers shading devices and room orientation under three different sky conditions. Journal of Daylighting, 9(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2022.11
Khidmat, R. P., Fukuda, H., Paramita, B., Qingsong, M., & Hariyadi, A. (2022). Investigation into the daylight performance of expanded-metal shading through parametric design and multi-objective optimisation in Japan. Journal of Building Engineering, 51, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104241
Kim, M., Leigh, S. B., Kim, T., & Cho, S. (2015). A study on external shading devices for reducing cooling loads and improving daylighting in office buildings. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(3), 687-694. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.687
Kirimtat, A., Koyunbaba, B. K., Chatzikonstantinou, I., & Sariyildiz, S. (2016). Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020
Kirimtat, A., Krejcar, O., Ekici, B., & Tasgetiren, M. F. (2019). Multi-objective energy and daylight optimization of amorphous shading devices in buildings. Solar Energy, 185, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.048
Kitsopoulou, A., Bellos, E., & Tzivanidis, C. (2024). An Up-to-Date Review of Passive Building Envelope Technologies for Sustainable Design. Energies, 17(16), 4039. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164039
Knudsen, M. D., & Petersen, S. (2020). Economic model predictive control of space heating and dynamic solar shading. Energy and Buildings, 209, 109661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109661
Koç, S. G., & Kalfa, S. M. (2021). The effects of shading devices on office building energy performance in Mediterranean climate regions. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102653
Lai, K., Wang, W., & Giles, H. (2017). Solar shading performance of window with constant and dynamic shading function in different climate zones. Solar Energy, 147, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.015
Lau, A. K. K., Salleh, E., Lim, C. H., & Sulaiman, M. Y. (2016). Potential of shading devices and glazing configurations on cooling energy savings for high-rise office buildings in hot-humid climates: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(2), 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.04.004
Li, X., Peng, J., Li, N., Wu, Y., Fang, Y., Li, T., ... & Wang, C. (2019). Optimal design of photovoltaic shading systems for multi-story buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 1024-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.246
Lim, T., Yim, W. S., & Kim, D. D. (2020). Evaluation of daylight and cooling performance of shading devices in residential buildings in South Korea. Energies, 13(18), 4749. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184749
Ma, Q., Ran, S., Chen, X., Li, L., Gao, W., & Wei, X. (2023). Study on the effect of photovoltaic louver shading and lighting control system on building energy consumption and daylighting. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 45(4), 10873-10889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2251439
Mandalaki, M., Zervas, K., Tsoutsos, T., & Vazakas, A. (2012). Assessment of fixed shading devices with integrated PV for efficient energy use. Solar Energy, 86(9), 2561-2575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.05.026
Mangkuto, R. A., Dewi, D. K., Herwandani, A. A., & Koerniawan, M. D. (2019). Design optimisation of internal shading device in multiple scenarios: Case study in Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Building Engineering, 24, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100745
Manzan, M., & Clarich, A. (2017). FAST energy and daylight optimization of an office with fixed and movable shading devices. Building and Environment, 113, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.035
Mendis, T., Huang, Z., Xu, S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Economic potential analysis of photovoltaic integrated shading strategies on commercial building facades in urban blocks: A case study of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Energy, 194, 116908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116908
Mohammed, A., Tariq, M. A. U. R., Ng, A. W. M., Zaheer, Z., Sadeq, S., Mohammed, M., & Mehdizadeh-Rad, H. (2022). Reducing the cooling loads of buildings using shading devices: A case study in Darwin. Sustainability, 14(7), 3775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073775
Motlagh, A. A., Havaeji, S., Orangian, M., & Samadani, A. (2024). Achieving Net-Zero Energy Buildings: Analyzing and Optimizing Strategies Using Sensitivity Analysis. Journal of Asian Energy Studies, 8, 51-67. https://doi.org/10.24112/jaes.080004
Mousavi, S. M. R., Mohammadi, S. H., & Jahanshahi Javaran, E. (2025). Effect of Shading Devices on an Office Building Energy Consumption in Hot Arid Climate: A Case Study for Kerman. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment, 16(1), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.5829/ijee.2025.16.01.10
Nazari, S., MirzaMohammadi, P. K., Sajadi, B., Ha, P. P., Talatahari, S., & Sareh, P. (2023). Designing energy-efficient and visually-thermally comfortable shading systems for office buildings in a cooling-dominant climate. Energy Reports,10(1), 2352-4847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.062
Nicoletti, F., Kaliakatsos, D., & Parise, M. (2023). Optimizing the control of Venetian blinds with artificial neural networks to achieve energy savings and visual comfort. Energy and Buildings, 294, 113279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113279
OECD/International Energy Agency. (2016). Energy and air pollution: World energy outlook special report 2016. OECD Publishing.
Özdemir, H., & Çakmak, B. Y. (2022). Evaluation of daylight and glare quality of office spaces with flat and dynamic shading system facades in hot arid climate. Journal of Daylighting, 9(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2022.15
Palmero-Marrero, A. I., & Oliveira, A. C. (2010). Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Applied energy, 87(6), 2040-2049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.020
Park, J. H., Yun, B. Y., Chang, S. J., Wi, S., Jeon, J., & Kim, S. (2020). Impact of a passive retrofit shading system on educational building to improve thermal comfort and energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 216, 109930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109930
Poirazis, H., Blomsterberg, Å., & Wall, M. (2008). Energy simulations for glazed office buildings in Sweden. Energy and buildings, 40(7), 1161-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.011
Prieto, A., Knaack, U., Auer, T., & Klein, T. (2018). Passive cooling & climate responsive façade design: Exploring the limits of passive cooling strategies to improve the performance of commercial buildings in warm climates. Energy and Buildings, 175, 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.016
Qingsong, M., Ran, S., Chen, X., Li, L., Gao, W., & Wei, X. (2023). Study on the effect of photovoltaic louver shading and lighting control system on building energy consumption and daylighting. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 45(4), 10873-10889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2251439
Rabani, M., Madessa, H. B., & Nord, N. (2021). Achieving zero-energy building performance with thermal and visual comfort enhancement through optimization of fenestration, envelope, shading device, and energy supply system. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101020
Sabbagh, M., Mandourah, S., & Hareri, R. (2022). Light shelves optimization for daylight improvement in typical public classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(20), 13297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013297
Samadi, S., Noorzai, E., Beltra, L. O., Abbasi, S., Beltrán, L. O., & Abbasi, S. A. (2019). computational approach for achieving optimum daylight inside buildings through automated kinetic shading systems. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.004
Sendi, M. (2014). The Effect of Technology to Integrate Aesthetic Desire of Contemporary Architecture with Environmental Principles in Façade Design. Architecture and Engineering, 7, 24-31.
Sern, C. H. Y., Liou, L. T. K., & Fadzil, S. F. S. (2022). Daylighting Performance of Integrated Light Shelf with Horizontal Light Pipe System for Deep Plan High-Rise Office in Tropical Climate. Journal of Daylighting, 9(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2022.6
Skarning, G. C. J., Hviid, C. A., & Svendsen, S. (2017). The effect of dynamic solar shading on energy, daylighting and thermal comfort in a nearly zero-energy loft room in Rome and Copenhagen. Energy and Buildings, 135, 302-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.053
Sorooshnia, E., Rashidi, M., Rahnamayiezekavat, P., Mahmoudkelayeh, S., Pourvaziri, M., Kamranfar, S., ... & Moezzi, R. (2025). A novel approach for optimized design of low-E windows and visual comfort for residential spaces. Energy and Built Environment, 6(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.08.002
Stamatakis, A., Mandalaki, M., & Tsoutsos, T. (2016). Multi-criteria analysis for PV integrated in shading devices for Mediterranean region. Energy and Buildings, 117, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.007
Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., & Tsangrassoulis, A. (2020). A review of automatic control strategies based on simulations for adaptive facades. Building and Environment, 175, 106801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106801
Taveres-Cachat, E., Lobaccaro, G., Goia, F., & Chaudhary, G. (2019). A methodology to improve the performance of PV integrated shading devices using multi-objective optimization. Applied energy, 247, 731-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.033
Theodoropoulou, P., Brembilla, E., Schipper, R., & Louter, C. (2024). Glare-based control strategy for Venetian blinds in a mixed-use conference space with fully glazed facades. Journal of Building Engineering, 82, 108181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108181
Tzempelikos, A., & Athienitis, A. K. (2007). The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Solar energy, 81(3), 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.015
Wang, R., Li, G., Xu, L., Wang, Y., & Peng, C. (2020). Integration of sun-tracking shading panels into window system towards maximum energy saving and non-glare daylighting. Applied Energy, 260(1), 114304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114304
Wong, N. H., & Istiadji, A. D. (2004). Effect of external shading devices on daylighting penetration in residential buildings. Lighting Research & Technology, 36(4), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782804li126oa
Wu, H., & Zhang, T. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of energy, visual, and thermal performance for building envelopes in China’s hot summer and cold winter climate zone. Journal of Building Engineering, 59, 105034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105034
Yao, J. (2014). An investigation into the impact of movable solar shades on energy, indoor thermal and visual comfort improvements. Building and environment, 71, 24-32.
Ye, Y., Xu, P., Mao, J., & Ji, Y. (2016). Experimental study on the effectiveness of internal shading devices. Energy and Buildings, 111, 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.040\
Yi, H., Kim, D., Kim, Y., Kim, D., Koh, J. S., & Kim, M. J. (2020). 3D-printed attachable kinetic shading device with alternate actuation: Use of shape-memory alloy (SMA) for climate-adaptive responsive architecture. Automation in Construction, 114, 103151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103151
Yin, X., & Muhieldeen, M. W. (2024). Impact of vertical shading designs on the cross-ventilation performance of a high-rise office building. Results in Engineering, 21(3), 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101676
Yun, G., Yoon, K. C., & Kim, K. S. (2014). The influence of shading control strategies on the visual comfort and energy demand of office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 84(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.040
Ziaee, N., & Vakilinezhad, R. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of daylight performance and thermal comfort in classrooms with light-shelves: Case studies in Tehran and Sari, Iran. Energy and Buildings, 254, 111590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111590
Zoure, A. N., & Genovese, P. V. (2023). Implementing natural ventilation and daylighting strategies for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in office buildings in Burkina Faso. Energy Reports, 9, 3319-3342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.02.017