تدوین چهارچوب ارتقای زیست‌پذیری در مجتمع‌های مسکونی معاصر با کاربست مدل معماری بیوفیلیک(مجتمع‌های منتخب شهر قزوین)

دوره 22، شماره 152
بهمن 1404
صفحه 29-42

نوع مقاله : مقالۀ پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه معماری، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

چکیده
بیان‌مسئله: ارتقای زیست‌پذیری در مجتمع‌های مسکونی به‌دلیل افزایش تراکم شهری و تغییرات محیطی یکی از چالش‌های مهم طراحی شهری شده است. معماری بیوفیلیک رویکردی نوین است که با ایجاد ارتباط میان انسان و طبیعت، زمینه‌ساز بهبود کیفیت زندگی و سلامت روانی ساکنان می‌شود. بنابراین به‌کارگیری مدل معماری بیوفیلیک می‌تواند نقش کلیدی در بهبود زیست‌پذیری مجتمع‌های مسکونی معاصر داشته باشد.
هدف پژوهش: این پژوهش با رویکردی کمی- کیفی مبتنی‌بر روش تحلیل نحو فضا به ارزیابی تطبیقی شیوه‌های طراحی مجتمع‌های مسکونی معاصر با اولویت‌دادن به راهبرد بیوفیلیک در ارتقای زیست‌پذیری مسکن می‌پردازد.  
روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش استدلال منطقی و قیاسی است که با شبیه‌سازی نمونه‌های منتخب (شش مجتمع مسکونی شهر قزوین) در نرم‌افزار دپت‌مپ، اثرگذاری شیوه‌های ترکیب توده/ فضا را بر مؤلفه‌های زیست‌پذیری مبتنی‌بر بیوفیلیا خوانش می‌کند. بررسی تطبیقی شامل شش گونۀ متمایز ترکیب فضایی ساختمان‌ها و محوطه به‌ کمک شاخص‌های اتصال، هم‌پیوندی، هم‌پیوندی بصری و آنتروپی و نیز تطبیق دو نمونه از پلان‌های تیپ طبقات به‌ کمک شاخص‌های اتصال، عمق و هم‌پیوندی است. 
نتیجه‌گیری: تحلیل نتایج در دو سطح پلان تیپ طبقات و سایت‌پلان نشان‌دهندۀ همبستگی مثبت این شاخص‌ها با مؤلفه‌های بیوفیلیایی شامل دسترسی به طبیعت، دیدهای سبز و کیفیت تعاملات اجتماعی است. دستاورد پژوهش تدوین راهکارهای ارتقای زیست‌پذیری برحسب وضعیت شاخص‌ها و شیوۀ طراحی در نمونه‌های مطالعه و ارائۀ چهارچوبی کاربردی برای معماران و برنامه‌ریزان شهری در طراحی فضاهای مسکونی زیست‌پذیر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Developing a Framework for Enhancing Livability in Contemporary Residential Complexes through the Application of the Biophilic Architecture Model

نویسنده English

Hosna Varmaghani
Department of Architecture, Qa. C., Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
چکیده English

Problem statement: Enhancing livability in residential complexes has become one of the major challenges of urban design due to increasing urban density and environmental changes. Biophilic architecture is a contemporary approach that, by creating a connection between humans and nature, contributes to improving the quality of life and the mental well-being of residents. Therefore, applying the biophilic architecture model can play a key role in improving the livability of contemporary residential complexes.
Research objective: This study employed a mixed quantitative–qualitative approach based on space syntax analysis and conducted a comparative evaluation of the design methods of contemporary residential complexes, emphasizing biophilic strategies for enhancing housing livability.
Research method: The research method is logical and deductive reasoning. By simulating selected case studies (six residential complexes in the city of Qazvin) in the Depthmap software, the study interprets the impact of mass/space composition methods on livability components based on biophilia. The comparative analysis includes six distinct spatial composition types of buildings and open spaces using the indicators of connectivity, integration, visual integration, and entropy, as well as the comparison of two typical floor plans using the indicators of connectivity, depth, and integration.
Conclusion: The analysis of results at both the typical floor plan and site plan levels demonstrates a positive correlation between these indicators and biophilic components such as access to nature, green views, and the quality of social interactions. The main achievement of this paper is the development of strategies for improving livability according to the status of indicators and design approaches in the studied cases, and the presentation of a practical framework for architects and urban planners in designing livable residential spaces.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Livability
  • Biophilic Housing
  • Space Syntax
  • Simulation
  • Depthmap
Al-Sayyed, H., & Al-Azhari, W. (2025). Investigating the role of biophilic design to enhance comfort in residential spaces: human physiological response in immersive virtual environment. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6, 1411425. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1411425 
Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press.
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417 
Behmanesh, A., Khakzand, M., & Kamran Kasmaei, H. (2023). Analyzing the optimal pattern of the spatial syntax of the access network in exhibition stands based on a futurology approach. Bagh-e Nazar, 20(124), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2023.367812.5281 
El‐Khouly, T., & Penn, A. (2012). Order, structure, and disorder in space syntax and linkography: intelligibility, entropy, and complexity measures. Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, 8242, 1-22. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1343621 
Farshidi, M., Mansouri, S. A., & Mirshahzadeh, S. (2022). Impact of mental components on the analysis of space syntax using a weighted graph (case study: Iranian Artists’ House-Tehran). Bagh-e Nazar, 19(113), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.313613.5042 
Gong, Y., Zoltán, E. S., & János, G. (2023). Healthy dwelling: the perspective of biophilic design in the design of the living space. Buildings, 13(8), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082020 
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
Jayakody, D. Y., Adams, V. M., Pecl, G., & Lester, E. (2024). What makes a place special? Understanding drivers and the nature of place attachment. Applied Geography, 163, 103177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103177 
Joye, Y., & Van den Berg, A. (2011). Is love for green in our genes? A critical analysis of evolutionary assumptions in restorative environments research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.004 
Karbasi, A. (2023). The developmental history of space configuration in the last hundred year houses of Najafabad. Bagh-e Nazar, 20(118), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.333782.5151 
Kellert, S. R. (2018). Nature by design: The practice of biophilic design. Yale University Press.
Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley.
Lee, E. J., & Park, S. J. (2025). Strategic biophilic residential design based on seniors’ health profiles: a Hrqol- driven approach. Buildings, 15(11), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111792 
Lefosse, D., Van Timmeren, A., & Ratti, C. (2023). Biophilia upscaling: A systematic literature review based on a three-metric approach. Sustainability, 15(22), 15702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215702 
Liu, Y., & Zhou, J. (2025). A review of Eye-Tracking Applications in biophilic design. Building and Environment, 267, 112179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112179 
Padashi Amlashi, A., Irani Behbahani, H., Khakpour, M., & Bandarabad, A. (2021). Analytical study of native architecture in order to provide livability indicators (study area: Amlash city). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 16(4), 697 – 710. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1400.16.4.14.3 
Radaei, M., Salehi, E., Faryadi, S., Masnavi, M. R., & Zebardast, L. (2022). An analysis on principles of ecological wisdom and sustainability of native houses in desert zones, case study: monuments of historical texture in Yazd city. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 13(Vol 3, Series 28), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.30473/grup.2020.40540.2169 
Salingaros, N. (2015). Biophilia and healing environments. healthy principles for designing the built world. Metropolis & Terrapin Bright Green.
Amir, A. L., Puspitaningtyas, A., & Santosa, H. R. (2015). Dwellers participation to achieve livable housing in Grudo rental flats. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.419 
Turner‐Skoff, J. B., & Cavender, N. (2019). The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities. Plants, People, Planet, 1(4), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.39 
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402 
Varmaghani, H., & Soltanzade, H. (2018). The role of gender and livelihood culture in forming house (comparing the Qajar’s houses of Gilan and Bushehr). Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(23), 123-134. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_69624.html?lang=en 
Varmaghani, H. (2022). Searching for the concept of Iranian house based on the adaptation of historical descriptions and physical structure (study of Yazd and Isfahan houses). Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism, 7(1), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.52547/ciauj.7.1.173 
Varmaghani, H. (2023). Evaluating of the placing pattern of green squares in the realization of the biophilic city (Savannah, USA and Hamedan, Iran). International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, 33(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.724 
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
Yaseen, F. R., & Mustafa, F. A. (2023). Visibility of nature-connectedness in school buildings: An analytical study using biophilic parameters, space syntax, and space/nature syntax. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(5), 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101973 
Yu, M., Chen, X., Zheng, X., Cui, W., Ji, Q., & Xing, H. (2025). Evaluation of spatial visual perception of streets based on deep learning and spatial syntax. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 18439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03189-z 
Yue, M., Zhang, X., & Zhang, J. (2024). Biophilic experience in high-rise residential areas in china: Factor structure and validity of a scale. Sustainability, 16(7), 2866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072866 
Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006