The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar

The Physical Model of Schools Based on the Fundamental Transformation Document (Adaptation of Nair’s Physical Models)

https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2024.425127.5491
Volume 21, Issue 136
October 2024
Pages 5-20
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

Hossein Abdolkhaleghi 1
Mehdi Hamzenejad 2
Mohsen Faizi 3

1 Master’s Student in Architecture, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

3 Full Professor in Architecture and Environmental Design, Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Problem statement: Many countries, including Iran, have developed fundamental educational reform documents promoting new life skills. While changing educational values necessitates changing educational environments, there has been no transformation in the environments in Iran.
Research objective: This study aims to realize the spatial requirements set by the transformation document. By developing a physical model, the research seeks to demonstrate how educational environments can support the implementation of the document.
Research method: This applied research utilizes an analytical-argumentative approach. Information was gathered through library and document research. Initially, content models were extracted from national documents. Prakash Nair’s physical models were then used as a basis and compared with these content models. The results were further validated and adjusted through comparison with an elite questionnaire to measure and correct its deviation from the elite standard. Ultimately, the selected models were adapted and prioritized based on the educational stages.
Conclusion: The research findings can be applied in two main dimensions: determining and adapting the physical model and classifying the models based on the educational stages. The wall-less model can support the content models of the transformation document, provided it includes movable walls to convert flexibility into adaptability. The consulting model and the learning street model are also compatible. In general, all workshop models have the potential for integration. Realizing the content models of the transformation document, particularly teacher-centered and active learning methods, and social educational aspects requires flexible, varied environments. These should include integrated spaces and a diverse array of facilities and environments. For the first and second stages of primary school, the consulting and the wall-less model are recommended, respectively. For the first and second stages of high school and the second stage of vocational school, the wall-less model and the learning street model are recommended, respectively.

Keywords

Innovative
Educational
Environments
Future
Schools
Flexibility
Bradbeer, C., Mahat, M., Byers, T., & Imms, W. (2019). A systematic review of the effects of innovative learning environments on teacher mind frames. University of Melbourne.
Comprehensive website of the fundamental transformation document of education. (2024). Retrieved from https://sanadtahavol.ir
Deppeler, J., & Aikens, K. (2020). Responsible innovation in school design–a systematic review. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 573-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1809782
Davoodi, Z., Alinia, Z., & Rezghi, M. (2021). Tarahi-ye madrese-ye bedon-e marz ba takid bar peyvand-E ba tabiat (mantaghe-ye moredi-ye babol) [Designing a borderless school with an emphasis on connection with nature (Case study: Babol). The Quarterly Journal of Art and Culture Studies, 6(22), 1-33. [in Persian].
Ebrahimi, T. (2019). Seyr-e taghirat-e amoozeshi va barname-ha-ye darsi [The course of educational changes and curricula]. Rosh-Modiryat-Madrese, 18(1), 55-52. http://noo.rs/vxwcr
Fundamental transformation document of education. (2011). Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution.
Hessari, P., Mohtasham, A., & Farzandost, A. (2020). Architectural design of schools with an emphasis on the motivation of Gardner’s multiple intelligences. Technology of Education Journal, 14(2), 341-353. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4682.2102
Hargreaves, A. (2002). Sustainability of educational change: The role of social geographies. Journal of educational change, 3, 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021218711015
Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0
Jackson, M., & Benade, L. (2017). Introduction to Access Special Issue: Modern Learning Environments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 744-748. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1317986
Kokko, A. K., & Hirsto, L. (2021). From physical spaces to learning environments: processes in which physical spaces are transformed into learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09315-0
Nair, P. lackney, j. Fielding, R. (2009). The Language of School Design: Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools. Education design Architects.
National curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (2012). Supreme Council of Education.
Nair, P. (2014). Blueprint for Tomorrow: redesigning schools for student-centered learning (S. Taghdir, Trans.). Iran University of Science and Technology Press.
Ouston, J., Maughan, B., & Rutter, M. (1991). Can schools change? II: Practice in six London secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345910020102
Pratt, D. (1983). Age segregation in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 
Program of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s public official education curriculum subsystem. (2020). Supreme Council of Education.
Priestley, M., Miller, K., Barrett, L., & Wallace, C. (2011). Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland: the Highland experience. British Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903540698
Reinius, H., Korhonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). The design of learning spaces matters: Perceived impact of the deskless school on learning and teaching. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09345-8
saffarheidari, H., & Hossainnjad, R. (2014). The Perspectives of Educational Justice (A study about the position of educational justice in the Document of Iran Education System Transformation). Foundations of Education, 4(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.22067/fe.v4i1.23696
Saghafi, M. R. (2016). A comparison of design patterns between ordinary schools and open schools in terms of the efficiency of the learning environment. Journal of Conservation and Architecture in Iran, 6(12), 13-22. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23453850.1395.6.12.4.9
Subsystem program for providing space, equipment and technology for public formal education system. (2016). Supreme Council of Education.
Subsystem for governance and management of the public education system. (2017). Supreme Council of Education.
Saeedi Kia, N. (2018). Seyr-e tahavol-e memari-ye madares iran dar gozar-e zaman [The evolution of school architecture in Iran over time]. Journal of Architecture, 1(1).1-6.
Thomson, P., McGregor, J., Sanders, E., & Alexiadou, N. (2009). Changing schools: more than a lick of paint and a well-orchestrated performance?. Improving Schools, 12(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480208100245
Woolner, P., Thomas, U., & Tiplady, L. (2018). Structural change from physical foundations: The role of the environment in enacting school change. Educational Change, 19, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9317-4

Home

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us