Abdalla, S. B., Rashid, M., & Ara, D. R. (2021). Plausibility of CAAD in Conceptual Design: Challenges in Architectural Engineering for Early-Stage Digital Design Tools. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 27(2), 04021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000457
Abdelhameed, W. (2011). Architectural form creation in the design studio: Physical modeling as an effective design tool. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 5(3), 81. 
Abdelhamid, T. G. (2020). A 10-Step Design Process for Architectural Design Studios. In Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility—Volume 1: Proceedings of the 2nd American University in the Emirates International Research Conference, AUEIRC’18–Dubai, UAE 2018 (pp. 1-11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32922-8_1
Acici, F. K. (2015). A Studio Study on Re-Interpret the Comments of a Brand in the Design Training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 295-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.769
Adams, R. S., Forin, T., Chua, M., & Radcliffe, D. (2016). Characterizing the work of coaching during design reviews. Design studies, 45, 30-67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.007
Akbari Sheldarei, F., Qasempour Moghadam, H., & Alizadeh, F.S. (2009). Modern methods of teaching learning. Fartab.
Alizadeh Miandouab, A., Akrami, G., & Nejati, P. (2022). A Review of Critical Training in Architectural Design. Bagh-e Nazar, 19(111), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.310531.5020
Alonso Schokel, L., & Maria Bravo, J. (1998). A manual of hermeneutics. Bloomsbury Academic
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 
Ansari, H. (2007). Nesbat-e Nazar va Amal dar Tarahi-ye Memari Bahregiri az Ravesh Tahlil-e Portokol Jahat-e Baresi va Tafsir-e Naghsh Movaled Haye Avali-e dar Bargharari Nesbat-e Miyan Nazar va Amal dar Tarahi-ye Memari [The ratio of opinion and action in architectural design using the protocol analysis method to investigate and interpret the role of primary generators in establishing the ratio between opinion and action in architectural design] [PHD Thesis, University of Tehran]. Iranian research institude for information science and technology (IranDoc). [in Persian]. https://elmnet.ir/doc/10023625-2401
Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. Van Nostrand Reinhold. 
Antoniades, A. C. (1990). Poetics Of Architecture Theory Of Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Arefe, M., Khazaei, S., & Khazai, A. (2020). utilization of instructional scaffolding Strategies and Determination their effectiveness on learning and achievement motivation of fifth graders with mathematics learning disabilities. Research in Teaching, 8(1), 217-198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34785/J012.2020.927 
Asojo, A., & Vo, H. (2021). Pedagogy+ Reflection: A Problem-Based Learning Case in Interior Design. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 12(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v12i2.25372
Ateş Akdeniz, A. (2023). Exploring the impact of self-regulated learning intervention on students’ strategy use and performance in a design studio course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(5), 1923-1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09798-3
Ayıran, N. (2015). Designerly way of understanding the role of theory. A| Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 12(2), 145-157.  https://www.az.itu.edu.tr/index.php/jfa/article/view/425
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
Brandt, C. B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M., & Reimer, Y. (2013). A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9181-5
Brophy, V., & Lewis, J. O. (2012). A green vitruvius: principles and practice of sustainable architectural design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776929
Brown, A. G. (2001). Architectural critique through digital scenario-building: Augmenting Architectural Criticism and Narrative. In Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference held at the Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, on July 8–11, 2001 (pp. 697-709). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0868-6_52
Budge, K. (2016). Learning to be: The modelling of art and design practice in university art and design teaching. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12060
Budiman, H., Numan, I., & Idham, N. C. (2021). Freehand Drawing and Architectural Expression. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 5(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol5.iss1.art5
Cabas, M. (2017). La maqueta: herramienta esencial en el proceso de diseno de Richard meier. EGA Expresion Grafica Arquitectonica, 22(29). https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2017.7354
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Cennamo, K., Douglas, S. A., Vernon, M., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Reimer, Y., & McGrath, M. (2011). Promoting creativity in the computer science design studio. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953344
Chomsky, N. (1968). Linguistic Contributions to the Study of mind: Future. Language and thinking, 323-364. 
Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2016). Dimensions of creative evaluation: Distinct design and reasoning strategies for aesthetic, functional and originality judgments. Design Studies, 45, 116-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.005
Chrzanowska, O. (2019). The role of sketching within the process of creative maturation of an architect in 21 century–sketching from nature in cognitive development. Interdisciplinary Context of Special Pedagogy, 26(1), 443-458.
Cilella, S., Berman, C., & Rheinfrank, J. (2010). Experience definition through storyboarding. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709966
Crolla, K., Hodgson, P., & Ho, A. W. Y. (2019). ‘Peer critique’in debate: A pedagogical tool for teaching architectural design studio. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130308
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design studies, 3(4), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
Cunningham, A. (1980). Educating around architecture. Studies in Higher Education, 5(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078012331377176
Dannels, D. P. (2005). Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of “crits” in design studios. Communication Education, 54(2), 136-160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500213165
Dannels, D., Gaffney, A. H., & Martin, K. N. (2008). Beyond content, deeper than delivery: What critique feedback reveals about communication expectations in design education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020212
Darke, J. (1979). The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies, 1(1), 36-44.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9
Dempsey, M., & Brennan, A. (2018). Empowering learners with self-selecting learning tools. INTED2018 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.1842
Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G., & Boudhraa, S. (2016). A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio. Design studies, 47, 164-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.003
Duerk, D. (1993). Architectural Programming: Information Management for Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2015). Evaluative thinking for successful educational innovation. OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
Eissa, D. (2019). Concept generation in the architectural design process: A suggested hybrid model of vertical and lateral thinking approaches. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100589
El-Latif, M. A., Al-Hagla, K. S., & Hasan, A. (2020). Overview on the criticism process in architecture pedagogy. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(2), 753-762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.01.019
Eslinger, E., White, B., Frederiksen, J., & Brobst, J. (2008). Supporting inquiry processes with an interactive learning environment: Inquiry Island. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9130-6
Farasatkhah, M. (2009). Quality evaluation of higher education in Iran: A case of applying Grounded Theory (GT)  (N. Rezae, Ed.). Higher Education Research and Planning Institute.
Feizbakhsh, H., Salehi, K., & Javadipour, M. (2023). Expected Learning Outcomes of Undergraduates in the Field of Educational Sciences: A Qualitative Study. Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 14(27), 305-336. https://doi.org/10.22034/hecs.2023.178422
Feizi, M., & Dezhpasand, S. (2022). Analysis of learning styles to improve architectural education (case study: architecture students of Urmia University). Iranian Architectural Studies, 7(14), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.22052/1.14.149
Fleischmann, K. (2021). Hands-on versus virtual: Reshaping the design classroom with blended learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220906393
Gheorghe, A. (2019). Digital Design Thinking in Architectural Education Testing Idea-Driven and Science-Driven Design Processes Towards Researching Polymer/Wood Composite Structures. Digital Wood Design: Innovative Techniques of Representation in Architectural Design, 1355-1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03676-8_54
Glasser, W. (1990). The quality school: Managing students without coercion. Perennial Library.
Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: Teacher–student communication. Ai Edam, 24(3), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006041000020X
Gray, C. M. (2013). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design & Communication in higher education, 12(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.12.2.195_1
Gunday Gul, C. G., & Afacan, Y. (2018). Analysing the effects of critique techniques on the success of interior architecture students. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12145
Habibullah, K. M., Musa, H., & Tijjani, M. (2022). Towards Improving the Students’ Learning in First Year Architecture Design Studio-The Critique Session. Iconic Research and Engineering Journal, 5(8), 187-191.  
Hamza, T. S., & Hassan, D. K. (2016). Consequential creativity: Student competency and lateral thinking incorporation in architectural education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(4), 587-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9321-4
Hansen, C. T., & Andreasen, M. M. (2004). A mapping of design decision-making. In DS 32: Proceedings of DESIGN 2004, the 8th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik.
Haskell, R. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition. Instruction, and Reasoning. Academic Press. 
Hassanpour, B., & Şahin, N. P. (2021). Technology adoption in architectural design studios for educational activities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(4), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1897037
Helmi, F., & Khaidzir, K. A. B. M. (2016). Analyzing the critical role of sketches in the visual transformation of architectural design. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 10(2), 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v10i2.958
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough?. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
Hettithanthri, U., & Hansen, P. (2022). Design studio practice in the context of architectural education: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2343-2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09694-2
Heylighen, A., Martin, W. M., & Cavallin, H. (2007). Building stories revisited: unlocking the knowledge capital of architectural practice. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2007.9684630
Hojat, I. (2003). Amoozesh Memari va Biarzeshi Arzesh ha [Architecture education and devaluation of values]. Fine Arts, 14(14), 63-70. [in Persian].  https://sid.ir/paper/419996/fa
Hojat, I. (2004). Amoozesh Khalagh-Tajrobe [Creative education; Experience]. Fine Arts, 18(18), 25-36. [in Persian].
Hojat, I. (2010). Architecture lesson. University of Tehran.
Hojat, I. (2022). Tradition and innovation in architectural education. University of Tehran.
Hojat, I., & Ansari, H. R. (2010). Rethinking architectural education Studies based on high school education. Journal of Fine Arts, 2(44), 15-26.  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.44.2.5
Hokanson, B. (2012). The design critique as a model for distributed learning. In The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning (pp. 71-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_5
Huet, G., Culley, S. J., McMahon, C. A., & Fortin, C. (2007). Making sense of engineering design review activities. Ai Edam, 21(3), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407000261
Jakaitis, J. (2015). Problem-based learning: formation of material environment design in urban spaces/Probleminis mokymas: daiktines aplinkos dizaino miesto erdvese formavimo raidos ypatumai. COACTIVITY: Philology, Educology, 23(1), 50-50. 
Khalil, M. H. (2020). Students’ consciousness of their problem solving approaches as a key to creativity in design. European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering, 3(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejef.v4i1.p93-109
Knight, J., Fitton, D., Phillips, C., & Price, D. (2019). Design thinking for innovation. Stress testing human factors in ideation sessions. The Design Journal, 22, 1929-1939.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594950
Kvan, T., & Jia, Y. (2005). Students’ learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design studies, 26(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.004
Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Lawrence, A., & Xavier, S. A. (2013). Lateral Thinking of Prospective Teachers. Online Submission, 1(1), 28-32. 
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Routledge. 
Lebahar, J. C. (1983). Le dessin d’architecte: simulation graphique et réduction d’incertitude. Parenthèses Editions. https://books.google.com/books/about/Le_dessin_d_architecte.html?id=H35wxY7uzLIC
Liu, Y., Castronovo, F., Messner, J., & Leicht, R. (2020). Evaluating the impact of virtual reality on design review meetings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34(1), 04019045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000856
Livingston, E. (2006). Ethnomethodological studies of mediated interaction and mundane expertise. The Sociological Review, 54(3), 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00623.x
Maciel, I. M., Felicio, G., da Silva, E. T., Villani, E., Krus, P., & Pereira, L. (2021). Mental Imagery for Multisensory Designers: Insights for Non-visual Design Cognition. In International Conference on Research into Design (pp. 109-118). Springer.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0041-8_10
Majidi, V., Seddighikavidak, S., Khanmohammadi, M. A., Salehi, K., Azad Armaki, M., & Majidi, M. (2023). The Effect of Visual Notes on the Rate of Learning Theoretical Courses in the Field of Architecture. ACSA/EAAE Teachers Conference: Educating the Cosmopolitan Architect, Reykjavik. https://doi.org/10.35483/ACSA.Teach.2023.68
McClean, D., & Hourigan, N. (2013). Critical dialogue in architecture studio: Peer interaction and feedback. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 8(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2013.00004
McDonald, J. K., & Michela, E. (2019). The design critique and the moral goods of studio pedagogy. Design Studies, 62, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.001
Megahed, N. (2018). Reflections on studio-based learning: assessment and critique. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(1), 63-80.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2017-0079
Memarian, H. (2019). Teaching and learning. 50 solutions to improve the quality of engineering education. University of Tehran.
Mewburn, I. (2012). Lost in translation: Reconsidering reflective practice and design studio pedagogy. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(4), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210393912
Mondegari, K., Nadimi, Z., & Fafazzoli, Z. (2022). Integration in architecture education, rethinking the issue by “rhetorical situation” model. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 23(92), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2022.306700.1857 
Murphy, K. M., Ivarsson, J., & Lymer, G. (2012). Embodied reasoning in architectural critique. Design Studies, 33(6), 530-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.005
Nadimi, H. (2010). Apprenticeship method, a second view. Fine Arts, 2(44), 27-36.  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.44.3.6
Noori Mokram, A., Janipour, B., & Taghvaei, V. (2023). Examining the components of architectural concept formation in teaching architectural design with a background-based approach. Bagh-e Nazar, 20(120), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.332886.5186
Oh, Y., Ishizaki, S., Gross, M. D., & Do, E. Y.-L. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34(3), 302-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004
Panahi, S., Hashempour, R., & Islami, GH. (2014). The mind architecture, from the “idea” to the “concept”. Hoviateshahr, 8(17), 25-34. https://sid.ir/paper/154493/en
Parker, E. C. (2018). A grounded theory of adolescent high school women’s choir singers’ process of social identity development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(4), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417743478
Percy, C. (2004). Critical absence versus critical engagement. Problematics of the crit in design learning and teaching. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(3), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.2.3.143/0
Pourshanazari, A. A., Roohbakhsh, A., Khazaei, M., & Tajadini, H. (2013). Comparing the long-term retention of a physiology course for medical students with the traditional and problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18, 91-97.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9357-0
Priya, R. S., Shabitha, P., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2020). Collaborative and participatory design approach in architectural design studios. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100033.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100033
Roberts, A. (2006). Cognitive styles and student progression in architectural design education. Design Studies, 27(2), 167-181.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.07.001
Roman, D. J., Osinski, M., & Erdmann, R. H. (2017). The construction process of grounded theory in administration. Contaduria y administracion, 62(3), 985-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2016.06.012
Raouf, A. (2006).Sahm moalem, Shive Moalem (negahi be Herfemandihaye Moalem) [The teacher’s share, the teacher’s style (a look at the teacher’s professionalism)]. Astan Quds Razavi. [in Persian].
Sachanowicz, T. (2019). Creativity and use of physical models in architectural design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/8/082072
Sadram, V. (2017). Proper imitation, a prerequisite for creativity imitative learning in architectural education (design process). Soffeh, 27(1), 5-16. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1396.27.1.1.1
Sadram, V. (2022). Aspects of reciprocal imitation between the tutor and the student in architectural design studio tutorials. Soffeh, 31(2), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.52547/sofeh.31.2.5
Sadram, V., & Nadimi, H. (2015). The role of exemplar sketches in design education. Safa, 25(1), 18-5.  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1394.25.1.1.7
Safavi, A. (2005). General methods and techniques of teaching. Moaser Publishing.
Sahin, M. (2019). Contextual learning strategies in the early stages of architecture education. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 313-320. http://hdl.handle.net/10679/9295
Santos, R. S., do Vale, C. P., Bogoni, B., & Kirkegaard, P. H. (2022). Freehand drawing as a didactic instrument. In A Focus on Pedagogy : Teaching, Learning and Research in the Modern Academy. Architecture, media, politics, society (AMPS). https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/147921/3/609726.pdf
Scagnetti, G. (2017). A dialogical model for studio critiques in design education. The Design Journal, 20, S781-S791. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353024
Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. RIBA Publications.
Seif, A. A. (2007). Educational psychology: psychology of learning and Instruction. Agah.
Senske, N. (2017). Evaluation and impact of a required computational thinking course for architecture students. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on computer science education. 525-530. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017750
Seo, H.-S. (2022). A Study on the Improvement for Bidet Product-Service Design for Seniors by PSS-based 4D Double Diamond Design Process Model. Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 25(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2022.25.1.29
Shaqour, E. N. (2021). Using Modern Teaching Strategies to Improve Architectural Design Studio Pedagogy in West Bank. MEJ. Mansoura Engineering Journal, 46(1), 46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/bfemu.2021.158858
Shariatrad, F., & Nadimi, H. (2016). Problem framing: The designer’s way of tackling design problems. Soffeh, 26(3), 5-24. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1395.26.3.1.8
Sharif, H.,& Nadimi, H. (2013). Ideation versus idea processing in architectural design thinking. Soffeh, 23(3). 19-26. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.1683870.1392.23.3.2.8
Sholanke, A., Adeboye, A., Alagbe, O., Fadipe, D., & Iyoha, J. (2018). Universal Design Framework for the Development of Adaptable Architectural Studios for Learning Environments. IATED, 8213-8224. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.1998
Shoop, B. L. (2014). Developing critical thinking, creativity and innovation skills. IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/InnoTek.2014.6877362
Sung, E., Kelley, T. R., & Han, J. (2019). Influence of sketching instruction on elementary students’ design cognition: a study of three sketching approaches. Journal of Engineering Design, 30(6), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2019.1617413
Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1996). What architects see in their sketches: Implications for design tools. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 
Thurlow, L., Ford, P., & Hudson, G. (2019). Skirting the sketch: An analysis of sketch inhibition within contemporary design higher education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(2), 478-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12207
Úbeda Blanco, M., Villalobos Alonso, D., & Pérez Barreiro, S. (2019). Little Big Models. The Tools of Japanese Architect Studios. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93749-6_88
Uluoǧlu, B. (2000). Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Design Studies, 21(1), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00002-2
Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., & Usman, I. (2010). Redefining critique methods as an assessment tools in architecture design studio. WSEAS transaction on advanced education, 359. 
Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Ani, A. C., & Surat, M. (2011). Retracted: Reconstructing the idea of critique session in architecture studio.‏ Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.014
Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Handryant, A. N., & Ani, A. I. C. (2013). Upgrading education architecture by redefining critique session in design studio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.711
Webster, H. (2005). The architectural review: A study of ritual, acculturation and reproduction in architectural education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4(3), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022205056169
Wong, H. L. H. (2011). Critique: A communicative event in design education. Visible Language, 45(3), 221-247.
Yew, E. H., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health professions education, 2(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004
Yorgancıoğlu, D., & Tunali, S. (2020). Critique’s Role in the Development of Design Literacy in Beginning Design Education. RChD: Creación y Pensamiento, 5(8), 49-62. 
Yurtkuran, S., Kırlı, G., & Taneli, Y. (2013). An Innovative approach in architectural education: Designing a utopia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 821-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.939
Zeinali Nasrabadi, F., & Farahza, N. (2022). overview of structural Education methods for architects an approach to the integration of structural taught in integration with architectural design process. Andišnāme-ye Me’māri, 2(3), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.30480/arcand.2022.4187.1028