Discourse Analysis of Texts Used for Selected Projects of the Memar Award (Residential-Apartment Projects 2001-2018) Based on Lawson’s Design Problem Structure Model

Volume 21, Issue 137
November 2024
Pages 13-22

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Master of Architecture, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract
Problem statement: This study asserts that verbal texts (along with images and drawings) are used to introduce design products, including the introduction of award-winning works in architectural competitions. These verbal texts create a simultaneous perception of the problem and the design solution in the minds of the audience. Therefore, this study seeks to answer the question of what mindset or discourse the texts attached to the award-winning projects of architectural design competitions, such as the Memar Award, create regarding the structure of the problem (and naturally its solution).
Research objective: This study aims to analyze the discourse of texts attached to the selected projects of the Memar Award based on Lawson’s proposed model regarding the structure of design problems.
Research method: This study utilized both quantitative and qualitative content analysis to evaluate the texts introducing the residential apartment projects selected for the Memar Award from 2001 to 2018. For this purpose, the texts introducing 25 selected projects in this category were coded and analyzed.
Conclusion: The study findings indicate that the texts of these projects emphasize highlighting the designer, internal constraints, and formal functions while marginalizing other components of the problem. In other words, the discourse of the texts of these projects emphasizes a singular, individual, and formal perspective on the issue of housing design, distancing itself from a participatory, collective, and radical view. Alternatively, it can be said that this discourse emphasizes the designer’s freedom of action.

Keywords

Ali Asgari, V., Tahmasbi, F., & Zirak, S. (2023). Stylistic Analysis of an Anecdote from Tazkirat- al-Awliya by Attar Neishabouri in the Light of Critical Discourse Analysis. Interpretation and Analysis of Persian Language and Literature Texts (Dehkhoda), 15(57). 386-407. https://doi.org/10.30495/DK.2022.1963679.2561
Andersson, J. E., Bloxham Zettersten, G. & Rönn, M. (2013). Architectural Competitions–Histories and Practice. Hamburgsund: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Bentley, I., McGlynn, S., Smith, G., Alcock, A., & Murrain, P. (2010). Responsive environments (M. Behzadfar, Trans.). University of Science and Technology Press. [in Persian] (original work published 1985)
Buchanan, R. (2021). Strategies of Design Research: Productive Science and Rhetorical Inquiry. In: R. Michel (Ed.), Design research now: essays and selected projects (J. Goudini & R. Sameh, Trans.). TahanGostar. [in Persian] (original work published 2007)
Catalano, T., & Waugh, L. R. (2020). Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Critical Discourse Studies (CDS), and Beyond. In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 1-12). (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; Vol. 26). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49379-0_1
Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dreyfus, S. (2004). The Five-Stage Model of Adult Skill Acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992
Ebadi, H., Goudini, J., & Mohamadzadeh Goudini, Y. (2022). The Role of Architecture in the Hegemony of Urban Discourse over Rural Discourse in Persian Poetic Literature. Bagh-e Nazar, 19(114), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/BAGH.2022.237600.4595
Eshrati, P. (2012). An Evaluation of the Relation between “Awareness” of Persian Garden Patterns and “Desire” to Use it in Landscape Designs Comparing landscape architecture students with professional designers. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 5(9), 163-182.
Gero, J. S., Kannengiesser, U., & Crilly, N. (2022). Abstracting and formalising the design co-evolution model. Design Science, 8, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.10
Goudini, J., & Fathi, S. (2019). Evaluation of the way of structuring the design problems in the selected designs of Iranian architecture competitions (case example: selected designs of the architect award of 2013). Memarishenasi, 2(13), 126-133.
Jahanbakhsh, B., & Pourmohammadi, M. (2018). Analyzing the effect of available technologies on the thinking of product beginner and pro designers using linkography method. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 23(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.22059/JFAVA.2018.66702
Johnstone, B., & Andrus, J. (2024). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Kiss, H. (2023). Identifying Dance Costume Design Constraints [Bachelor’s thesis, Alto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture], Altodoc. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/15c5103c-8948-435e-9ae4-35388c847e33/content
Kolodner, J L., & Wills, L M (1996). Powers of Observation in Creative Design. Design Studies, 17(4), 385-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00021-X
Kultima, A., Alha, K., & Nummenmaa, T. (2016). Design constraints in game design case: survival mode game jam 2016. In Proceedings of the international conference on game jams, hackathons, and game creation events (pp. 22-29).
Lawson, B. (1994). Design in Mind. Butterworth-Heinmann Ltd.
Lawson, B. (2004). What Designers Know. Architectural Press / Elsevier.
Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think. Routledge.
Lönngren, J., & Van Poeck, K. (2021). Wicked problems: A mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 481-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1859415
Mashreghi, G., & Ansari, H. R. (2023). Constraint Ontology in Design Process. Soffeh, 33(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.52547/SOFEH.33.1.9
Mehrdoust, E., Amin-poor, A., & Nadimi, H. (2022). Architecture Design Utilizing Precedents The Study of How Iranian Professional Architects Use Design Precedents. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 8(16), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.22052/1.16.61
Meinel, M., Eismann, T. T., Fixson, S. K., & Voigt, K. I. (2023). The weakest link: the importance of problem framing in design thinking. In K. Straker & C. Wrigley (Eds.), Research Handbook on Design Thinking (pp. 232-245). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802203134.00021
Mose Biskjaer, M., & Halskov, K. (2014). Decisive constraints as a creative resource in interaction design. Digital Creativity, 25(1), 27-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.855239
Noraei, S., Farkish, H., Mirza Kochak Khoshnevis, A., Taji, M., & Moradi Nasab, H. (2023). Critical evaluation of the presentational variables in artistic-architectural institution and the public architecture, (2008-2018). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud, 11 (44), 97-111. http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-1929-fa.html
Sadeghi, A., & Karami, E. (2022). Evaluation of magnificent buildings after the Islamic revolution based on biophilic, biomimicry, and biomorphic indicators, Case Study: Winners of the Architect Award. International Journal Of Culture and Biotechnology Architecture (IJBA), 2(7supplement), 29-51.
Sayfi, K., Talischi, G., & Dezhdar, O. (2021). Explaining Experts’ Values of Iran’s Architectural Design Society. Bagh-e Nazar, 17(93), 23-34.  https://doi.org/10.22034/BAGH.2020.221468.4474