The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar

The Role of Spatial Visibility on the Visitor Density in Exhibition Complexes (Case Study: Iran- Iraq War Museum)

https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2024.466411.5631
Volume 21, Issue 140
February 2025
Pages 33-44
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

Leila Aram 1
Kaveh Bazrafkan 1
Shima Roshanzamir 2
Seyed Amirhossein Garakani 1

1 Department of Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Urban Design, Art University of Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract
Problem statement: Understanding and redefining the relationship between spatial configuration and the way audiences perceive and interact with their environment is a key area of knowledge in the architectural design process. In this context, the ISOVIST theory, based on analyzing and translating spatial characteristics and geometry, provides an operational framework to explore this relationship. However, it appears that the topological content of space has received less attention in this field, leaving some layers of the designer’s perception and audience experience obscured. 
Research objective: This study aims to formulate and structure the geometric analyses of the Isovist theory to explain the relationship between spatial visibility variables and visitor presence density. It seeks to redefine the geometric-topological layers within cognitive-behavioral frameworks of space to better understand architecture.
Research method:This study used quantitative and analytical methods to examine the correlation between variables and values in the Iran-Iraq War Museum exhibition complexes. Field observations were conducted by timing and tracking visitor stop-and-move patterns using CCTV cameras. Data analysis utilized machine learning techniques based on regression models and significance testing for correlation. The study employed the concept of a topological graph of cognitive-behavioral systems, focusing on various museum sections, including exhibition, interactive, simulation, and recreational spaces.
Conclusion: The findings indicate diverse patterns of interaction between spatial configuration and visitor behavior across the museum’s four areas. Factors such as Z radial, 3d integration, visual dispersion, uniform distribution of the field of view, and curvilinear forms play a central role in forming audience experiences. The results suggest that specific and independent analyses of museum spaces based on their functions provide a more accurate understanding of the relationship between space and user behavior. Furthermore, this study underscores the necessity of critiquing and revising the space syntax theory to expand its applicability in the realm of non-geometric and topological cognitive-behavioral systems.

Keywords

Architecture
Spatial Research
Spatial Computation
Cognitive-Behavioral System
Topology
Machine Learning
Adams, C. C., & Franzosa, R. D. (2007). Introduction to topology: pure and applied. Pearson. 
Akoglu, H. (2018). User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 
Ali, L. A., & Mustafa, F. A. (2023). Mosque Morphological Analysis: The Impact of Indoor Spatial–Volumetric Visibility on Worshipers’ Visual Comfort. Sustainability. Sustainability, 15(13), 10376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310376
Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(S1), S17-S33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20016
Aram, Leila, & Bazrafkan, K. (2019). Behavior-Space System Explanation in Proportion of Program Necessity and Freedom (Case study: National Library and Library of the University of Tehran In Between Spaces). HOVIATESHAHR, 13(38 ), 93-106. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/154574/en 
Bazrafkan, K. (2017). Who’s Afraid of [against] formalism? [against] formalism: “faraway - so close”. Memar, (101), 64-69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366249239_Against_Formalism_Faraway_so_Close
Bechtel, R. B., & Churchman, A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of environmental psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields. Environment and Planning B, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1068/b060047
Bhatia, S., Chalup, S. K., & Ostwald, M. J. (2013). Wayfinding: a method for the empirical evaluation of structural saliency using 3d isovists. Architectural Science Review, 56(3), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2013.811635 
Dalton, R, C., & Dalton, N. S. (2001). Omnivista: An application for isovist field and path analysis. 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1022
Dalton, R. C., Hölscher, C., & Turner, A. (2012). Understanding space: The nascent synthesis of cognition and the syntax of spatial morphologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3901ge
Dawes, M. J., & Ostwald, M. J. (2021). Isovists: Spatio-visual Mathematics in  Architecture. In B. Sriraman (Eds.), Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences. Springer International Publishing (pp. 1419-1431). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57072-3_5
Dubey, R. K., Morad, M. G., Sohn, S. S., Xue, D., Thrash, T., Hölscher, C., & Kapadia, M. (2022). Cognitively grounded floorplan optimization to nudge occupant route choices. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4003119
Eftekhari, H., Bazrafkan, K., & Irani Behbahani, H. (2023). Explaining the Relation Between the Spatial and Symbolic System in the Eventuality of Large-Scale Spaces (Case Study: Sabzeh Meydan and Mesgarha Bazaar in Tehran’s Grand Bazaar). Bagh-e Nazar, 20(120), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2023.357436.5250
Forrest, R. (2013). Museum atmospherics: The role of the exhibition environment in the visitor experience. Visitor Studies, 16(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2013.827023
Franz, G., & Wiener, J. (2005). Exploring isovist-based correlates of spatial behavior and experience. In A. van Nes (Ed.), 5th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 503-517). Techne Press. https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-D55F-8 
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton, Mifflin and Company. 
Gray, J., & Ferreirós, J. (2021). Epistemology of Geometry. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved October 17, 2024, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-geometry/
Greene, J., & D’Oliveira, M. (2005). Learning to use statistical tests in psychology. McGraw-Hill International. 
Harper, D. (2016). Geometry. In Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved August 15, 2024, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/geometry
Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
Hillier, B., & Vaughan, L. (2007). The city as one thing. Progress in planning, 67(3), 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001
Jabi, W., & Chatzivasileiadi, A. (2021). Topologic: Exploring spatial reasoning through geometry, topology, and semantics. In S. Eloy, D. Leite Viana, F. Morais, & J. Vieira Vaz (Eds.), Formal methods in architecture. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57509-0_25
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge university press.
Krukar, J., Manivannan, C., Bhatt, M., & Schultz, C. (2021). Embodied 3D isovists: A method to model the visual perception of space. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(8), 2307-2325. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320974533
Lazaridou, A., & Psarra, S. (2015). Experiencing three-dimensional museum environments: An investigation of the Ashmolean Museum and the Museum of Scotland. Proceedings of the Tenth International Space Syntax Symposium. UCL. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1477235
Mallgrave, H. F. (2013). Architecture and embodiment: the implications of the new sciences and humanities for design. Routledge.
McElhinney, S. (2020). The Isovist_App: a basic user guide. Isovist. Available at: https://isovists.org/download/5186/isovist_UserGuide_1-6.pdf.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Zhu, R. (2007). The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 174-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/519146
Montello, D. R. (2007). The contribution of space syntax to a comprehensive theory of environmental psychology. 6th international space syntax symposium. 1-12. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5fa77d18672ef3b614a307cb71fe30bcd57dab59
Omer, I., & Kaplan, N. (2017). Using space syntax and agent-based approaches for modeling pedestrian volume at the urban scale. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.007
Psarra, S., Wineman, J., Xu, Y., & Kaynar, I. (2007). Tracing the modern: Space, narrative and exploration in the Museum of Modern Art. International space syntax symposium. http://www.kaynar-rohloff.com/papers/PsarraWinemanXuKaynar_SpaceSyntax07.pdf
Poerschke, U. (2016). Architectural Theory of Modernism: Relating Functions and Forms. Routledge.
Tabibi, S. J., Maleki, M. R., & Delgoshaei, B. (2009). Writing Successful Theses, Dissertations, Research Projects and Scientific Articles. Ferdows.
Turner, A., & Penn, A. (1999). Making isovists syntactic: isovist integration analysis. 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax. 103-121.
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1), 103-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b2684
Varoudis, T., & Psarra, S. (2014). Beyond two dimensions: architecture through three dimensional visibility graph analysis. The Journal of Space Syntax, 5(1), 91-108. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1477266
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Rostrup, N., Skov, M., Corradi, G., & Nadal, M. (2019). Preference for curvilinear contour in interior architectural spaces: Evidence from experts and nonexperts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000150 
Wineman, J., & Peponis, J. (2009). Constructing spatial meaning: Spatial affordances in museum design. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 86-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335534
Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. W W Norton & Co.

Home

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us