The Realization of “Islamic Architecture” from the Perspective of the Theory of “Religious Science” (In Search of Theoretical Foundations for “Islamic Architecture School” as One of the Components of the “New Islamic-Iranian Civilization”)

Volume 21, Issue 141
March 2025
Pages 43-60

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Rajaee teacher training University, Tehran, Iran.

2 2. Ph.D. Student in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Problem Statement: “Religious science” has ancient roots. However, its modern form, known as the theory of religious science, emerged following the advent of modern sciences. This theory was introduced and debated after the Islamic Revolution in Iran with the aim of Islamizing sciences and producing knowledge in line with the realization of the “New Islamic-Iranian Civilization,” eventually reaching a considerable degree of coherence. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the application of this theory in various fields of knowledge. On the other hand, the discourse on Islamic architecture and its realization in contemporary and future Iranian architecture is one of the major challenges in the field. In this regard, the relationship between these two subjects has been examined through the research question: “What are the indicators of Islamic architecture from the perspective of the theory of religious science?”
Research Objective: This study aims to define the indicators, framework, and principles for the “realization of Islamic architecture” by utilizing the foundations of the “theory of religious science.”
Research Method: To achieve the research objective, the criteria of religious science were first identified, followed by an exploration of the dimensions of architecture from the perspective of Islamic wisdom through a library-based method. The extracted data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Subsequently, based on the obtained data and employing logical reasoning, a conceptual framework for the realization of Islamic architecture from the perspective of the theory of religious science was developed.
Conclusion: The research findings indicate that the realization of Islamic architecture from the perspective of the theory of religious science requires the Islamization of five key criteria: “subject, foundation, source, method, and application” within four architectural domains: “natural and fundamental sciences, humanities and social sciences, applied sciences and engineering, and art.” The combination of these elements has led to the identification of twenty indicators for “Islamic architecture.” These twenty indicators collectively establish a coherent epistemological system under the title of “Islamic architecture.” It is evident that architects’ understanding and their intention to adhere to Islamic teachings constitute the necessary condition for the creation of worthy architectural works. The sufficient condition, however, is the ability to transform theoretical knowledge into practice and tangible architectural outcomes. The architectural works resulting from this process are relatively “Islamic.”

Keywords

اندرزهاى امام کاظم علیه السلام  [The instructions of Imam Kazem a.s.]. (n.d.). Shia Hadith Library. Retrieved 2023, from https://www.hadithlib.com/hadithtxts/view/30022116
تبیین نظریۀ علم دینی توسط آیت‌الله رشاد [Explanation of the Theory of Religious Science by Ayatollah Rashad]. (2020). Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought. Retrieved 2024 from https://iict.ac.ir/1398/07/elmedini/
Abbas Tabar Moghari, R. (2023). The perspective of the Islamic revolution in the realization of the new Islamic-Iranian civilization. Scientific Journal Political Sociology of the Islamic Revolution, 2(1), 7-22. https://www.psirj.ir/article_144864.html?lang=en 
Agasharifian Esfehani, M., & Aminpour, A. (2015). Magnanimity letter of architecture; Fourteen main principles of professional ethics in architecture and urbanism. The Culure if Islamic Architecture & Urbanism, 1(1), 81-100. http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-70-fa.html 
Aminpoor, A., Piroozmand, A., & Jahan Bakhsh, A. (2018). The methodology of theorizing Islamic art and architecture. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(96), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.30471/mssh.2018.1504 
Ansarian, H. (2008). عرفان اسلامی [Islamic Mysticism] (Vol. 1). Darol Erfan. [in persian]
Azadegan, E. (2013). A Comparison between the Philosophical Foundations of Religious Science and Naturalistic Science. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(72), 31-54. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_189.html?lang=en 
Bagheri, Kh. (2012). The nature of religious science: an epistemological view on the relationship between religion and human science. Ministry of Culture & Islamic Guidance.
Bagheri, Kh. (2015). مدل تأسیسی علم دینی [Foundational Model of Religious Science]. Hekmate Islami. [in persian]
Belanian, M. R. (2008). علم سکولار یا علم دینی؟ [Secular Science or Religious Science]. Ma’refat, (121), 119-136. https://encr.pw/euxcX persian]
Bostan, H. (2016). روش نظریه‌سازی دینی در علوم اجتماعی [The Methodology of Religious Theory Building in Social Sciences]. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 22(86), 121-141. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1150.html?lang=fa  [in Persian]
Bostan, H. (2019). Revising Ijtihadi-Experimental Model of Religious Science. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(98), 29-49. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1561.html?lang=en 
Fanaei Ashkouri, M. (2013). A Believers’ Account of Modern Sciences. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(72), 7-30. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_188.html?lang=en 
Geraei, A., & Mesbah, A. (2020). Critique of the Islamic Sciences Academy’s view in religious science. Isra Hikmat, 12(1), 93-128. https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_132168.html?lang=en 
Gharaati, M. (2015). Portrait of housing and urban islamic. Cultural Center of Lessons from the Quran.
Ghorbani, R. (2014). معماری و شهرسازی مطلوب اسلامی [Desirable Islamic Architecture and Urban Planning]. Shabake-ye Andisheh [Andisheh Network]. [in Persian]
Golshani, M. (2012). The holy Quran and the sciences of nature. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Golshani, M. (2015a). From secular science to religious science. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Golshani, M. (2015b). چرا علم اسلامی معنادرا و طلوب است [Why Islamic Science is Meaningful and Desired]. Naghd-e Ketab [Book Review Journal], 16(72-73), 201-231. https://naghd.iict.ac.ir/article_703992.html [in persian]
Hojjat, I. (2003). آموزش معماری و بی‌ارزشی ارزش‌ها [Architectural Education and the Devaluation of Values]. Fine Arts, 14(14), 63-70. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_10814.html  [in Persian]
Jawadi-Amuli, A. A. (2007). Right obligation in Islamic‬. Esra.
Jawadi-Amuli, A. A. (2008). Shariat in the light of cognition. Esra.
Jawadi-Amuli, A. A. (2020). The role of the intellect in the Geometry of Religious Knowledge. Esra.
Jawadi-Amuli, A. A. (2023). Religious Science (H. Parsania, Ed.). University of Tehran Press.
Khamenei, S. A. (2019). بیانیۀ «گام دوم انقلاب» خطاب به ملت ایران [The Second Step of the Revolution Statement to the People of Iran]. Khamenei: Notebook for the Preservation and Publication of the Works of Hazrat Ayatollah the Great Khamenei. Retrieved from https://farsi.khamenei.ir/message-content?id=41673 [in Persian]
Khomeini, R. A. (2016). شرح دعای سحر  [Explanation of the Dawn Prayer]. Mo’asese-ye Tanzim va Nashr-e Asar-e Emam Khomeini.
Khosropanah, A. (2012). Explanation and analysis of “Velayee” theory of knowledge. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18(71), 9-44. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_194.html?lang=en 
Khosropanah, A. (2013). Interaction between Reason and Religion and Its Impact on Islamic Culture. Strategy for Culture, 6(23), 29-52. https://www.jsfc.ir/article_15325.html?lang=en 
Khosropanah, A., & Babaei, Q. (2015). نظریۀ حاکمیت جهان‌بینی دینی بر دانش [The Theory of the Domination of Religious Worldview over Knowledge]. Nghd-e Ketab [Book Criticism], 16(72-73), 89-133. https://naghd.iict.ac.ir/article_703986.html [in Persian]
Majlesi, M. B. (2011). Bihar al-Anwar. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.
Mardani, S. Z., Hojat, I., & Maaref, M. (2023). The investigation of the challenge of “Islamic architecture” and “Muslim architecture”. Bagh-e Nazar, 20(127), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2023.370505.5294 
Mesbah Yazdi, M. T. (2015). Realationship between religion and science (A. Mesbah Yazdi, Ed.). Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.
Mirbagheri, S. M. (2017). نسبت دین با علم و فناوری [The Relationship Between Religion, Science, and Technology]. Tamadon-e Novin-e Islami [New Islamic Civilization Publications]. [in Persian]
Mohammadi Abtahi, S. M. T. (2022). An Introduction to the idea of Islamic Humanities. Markaz-e Oloum Ensani-ye Islami-ye Sadra [Sadra Islamic Human Sciences Research Center].
Moradpour, R., Mondegari, K., & Nadimi, H. (2019). Ethics of building (perspective of virtue ethics and Kantian ethics). Journal of Architectural Thought, 3(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2019.10521.1174 
Motahari, M. (1996). Understanding Islamic sciences: philosophy, theology, mysticism, morality, jurisprudence‬. Sadra.
Motahari, M. (2012). عقل و علم [Reason and Science]. Binshe Motaher. [in Persian]
Motahari, M. (2020). شرح مبسوط منظومه [Detailed description of the system] (Vol. 2). Sadra. [in Persian]
Movahed Abtahi, S. M. T. (2023). تأملاتی در باب علم دینی [Reflections on Religious Science]. Institute for Cultural, Social and Civilization Studies. [in Persian]
Naghizadeh, M. (2020). کرسی نظریه‌پردازی: فضای حیات طیبه؛ شهر آرمانی اسلام [Theory Chair: Space of the Ideal Islamic City, The Utopian City in Islam]. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 5(9), 193-196. https://jias.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111766.html [in Persian]
Nari Ghomi, M., & Noghrekar, S. (2016). A scope to situation of architectural technology amongst the system of Hekmat (wisdom) of Muslims. Journal of Islamic Architecture Research, 4(3), 76-93. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-548-fa.html 
Noghrekar, S. (2020). [Explaining the Concept of Islamic Architecture and Its Impact on the Design Process, Architectural Criticism, Architectural Education, and Training Architects] [Conferense session]. Promotion Chair for Theorizing “Islamic Architecture”Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.
Noghrekar, A. H. (2021). Islamic wisdom in the creation of works of neo and urbanism. Soroush.Noghrekar, A.H. (2011). مبانی نظری معماری [Theoretical Foundations of Architecture]. Payam Noor University. [in Persian]
Noghrekar, S. (2022a). Forty steps to compile the “School of Islamic Architecture” - (In search of a model for the comprehensive benefit of the teachings “Islamic Wisdom” in “Architecture”(. Journal of Islamic Architecture Research, 9(4), 123-139. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1523-fa.html 
Noghrekar, S. (2022b). تبیین مفهوم معماری اسلامی و تأثیر آن بر فرایند طراحی، نقد معماری، آموزش معماری و تربیت معماران [Clarifying the concept of Islamic architecture and its impact on the process of design, architectural critique, architectural education, and the training of architects] [Conference Session]. Koresi-ye Nazari-ye pardazi-ye me’mari-ye Islami [Chair for the Promotion of Islamic Architecture Theory], Shahid Rajaee University, Tehran, Iran. [in Persian]
Noghrekar, S. (2024). رهپویی، راهنمایی و داوری پایان‌نامۀ معماری با دریافتی از حکمت اسلامی [Guidance, Advising, and Evaluating Architecture Theses Based on Islamic Wisdom]. Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University. [in Persian]
Noghrekar, S. (n.d.). حکمت معماری اسلامی  [Islamic Architecture Wisdom] [Unpublished manuscript]. Shahid Rajaee University. [in Persian]
Pirouzmand, A. R. (2014). دوگونگی و ابهام در سرنوشت اسلامیت علوم در کلام فلسوف متاله  [Duality and Ambiguity in the Fate of the Islamization of Sciences in the Words of Philosophers]. Naghd-e Ketab, 15(69), 129-180. https://naghd.iict.ac.ir/article_704100.html [in Persian]
Sadeghi Rashad, A. A. (2021). A Second Look at the Criterion of Religious Science. Qabasat, 26(100), 5-14. https://qabasat.iict.ac.ir/article_245061.html?lang=en 
Sharifi, A. H. (2017). Methodology of Islamic Humanities. Markaz-e Oloum Ensani-ye Islami-ye Sadra [Sadra Islamic Human Sciences Research Center].
Sheikh Bahaei, M. H. (2012). دیوان شیخ بهایی [Poems of Sheikh Bahaei]. Zarrin. [in persian]
Souzanchi, H. (2011). معنا، امکان و راهکارهای تحقق علم دینی [Meaning, Possibility, and Solutions for Achieving Religious Science]. Institute for Cultural, Social and Civilization Studies. [in persian]
Tehrani, M. (2023). ادب الهی [Divine Politeness] (M. Atrinezhad & S. A. A. Hossieni, Eds.). Masabih al-Hoda Cultural Research Institute. [in persian]
Vaezi, A. (2008). Religious Science in the View of Ayatullah Javadi Amoli. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 14(54), 9-23. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_440.html