An Analysis of the Design Process of the 2 nd Generation of Leading Architects in the Post-Islamic Revolution of Iran

Volume 22, Issue 146
August 2025
Pages 5-26

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Art & Architecture, Ma.c., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Department of Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Khayyam University, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Problem statement: The contemporary architecture of Iran and the works formed in its context are the arena of representation of the current thoughts and discourses of Iranian society in this era. By reading the works of architecture and the resulting knowledge, one can get a proper understanding of the worldview that governs the platform. The problem of the research is to strive to answer the knowledge gap about the lack of registration of tacit knowledge that is created in the Intermediate of professional and academic education, to provide an opportunity to analyze the trend of the progressive architecture of Iran and to investigate the interaction of the professional platform and the progressive trend.
Research objective: The present research attempts to study and analyze the process capitals in the offices of the 2nd generation of leading architects after the revolution in Iran and to document and match them with the processes and methods known by process researchers, to record the concrete knowledge available in these offices, and the impact of quality of utilization of these processes. processes. The purpose is to gain knowledge of the process of upgrading and optimizing the design processes in the architectural offices of the second-generation architects’ post-revolution of Iran.
Research method: This research is qualitative research employing the grounded theory method, and, it uses library-documentary and field methods in data collection. Finally, the data analysis was carried out using MAXQDA software version 2020.
Conclusion: The results show that Iran’s professional society is transitioning from intuitive thinking to analytical thinking.

Keywords

2023). Metaphorical Reasoning in Architectural Design and Construction. Creative City Design, 1(1), 32-45. Retrieved from sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/919430.
‏Aeini, S., Afzalian, Kh.,  Etessam, I.,&  Shariatrad, F. (2021). Problem Framing, Interdisciplinary Problem Solving Strategy. Creative City Design, 5(3), 16. Retrieved from ://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/919485‎‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.  
Aeini, S., Afzalian, Kh., Etesam, I., & Shariatrad, F. (2022a). Metaphor as an Extension of Deduction and Method of Architectural Design Reasoning. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 19(110), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.303427.4993 
Aeini, S., Afzalian, Kh., Etesam, I., & Shariatrad, F. (2022b). Narrative Design as a Historical Technique (Case Study: Grand Mosque of Fahraj). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(104), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2021.274960.4816  
Alexander, Ch. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press.
Bastani, M., & Mahmoodi, A. S. M. (2019). Learning Styles and Analogical Thinking Method during the Design Process of Architecture. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 24(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2019.261784.672064
Bergman, E., Lund, A., Dubberly, H., Tognazzini, B., & Intille, S. (2004). Video visions of the future: a critical review (pp. 1584-1585). Presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, Vienna, Austria: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986156 
Brawne, M. (2003). Architectural Thought: The Design Process and the Expectant Eye. Architectural Press.
Brawne, M. (2017). Architectural thought : the design process and the expectant eye (S. Haghir, Trans.). Ketab fekar no. (Original work published 2005)
Casakin, H. P. (2006). Assessing the Use of Metaphors in the Design Process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(2), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3196 
Catanese, A. J. (1979). Introduction to architecture. McGraw-Hill Publications.
Chakrabarti, A; & Blessing, L. (2015). A review of theories and models of design. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 95(4), 325-340.
Christopher, J. (2011). Design methods : seeds of human futures (F. Sarmast, Trans.). markz neshar daneshgangi. (Original work published 1927)
Chupin, J. (2011). Judgement by design: Towards a model for studying and improving the competition process in architecture and urban design. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.004 
Corbin, J; & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Cross, N., & Roozenburg, N. (1992). Modelling the Design Process in Engineering and in Architecture. Journal of Engineering Design, 3(4), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544829208914765 
Goudini, J. (2020). Proposing a Holistic Definition of the Architecture Design Process. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(91), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.201047.4298 
Goudini, J., & Fathi, S. (2019). Assessment of the way of structuring design issues in the selected designs of Iranian architecture competitions (case example: the selected designs of the architect award of 2013). Memarishenasi, 2(13), 1-8.
Goudini, J., Rezazadeh, E., & Koulivandi, S. (2024). Developing a Model for the Totality of Designers’ Actions in the Architectural Design Process (Aiming for Consensus on Ex-Models). The Monthly Scientific Journalof Bagh-e Nazar, 21(135), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2024.404676.5409
Koberg, D., & Bagnall, J. (1974). The Universal Traveler: A Soft-Systems Guide to: Creativity, Problem-Solving, and the Process of Reaching Goals. William Kaufman, Los Altos.
Kumar, V. (2004). Innovation Planning Toolkit. In DRS Biennial Conference Series. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2004/researchpapers/201 
Lang, J. (2015). Creating architectural theory: the role of behavioral...‎(A. Ainifar, Trans.). University of Tehran, Publishing Institute. (Original work published 1938)
Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think The design process demystified (Fourth edition). Architectural Press.
‏Lawson, B. (2013). How designers think : the design process demystified (H. Nadimi, Trans.). Shahid Beheshti University Printing and Publishing Center. (Original work published 2005)
Lawson, B. (2016). ‭ What Designers Know (H. Nadimi, Trans.). Shahid Beheshti University Printing and Publishing Center. (Original work published 2004)‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬
LenzholzerI, S., Duchhart, I., & Van den Brink, A. (1992). The relationship between research and design. In Research in Landscape Architecture - Methods and Methodology. Routledge.
Mehr-doust, E., Amin-poor, A., & Nadimi, H. (2022). Architecture Design Utilizing Precedents The Study of How Iranian Professional Architects Use Design Precedents. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 8(16), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.22052/1.16.61
Mohammadpour, A. (2018). Counter-Method (2nd ed.). Logos.
‏Nadimi, H., & Shariat Rad, F. (2012). Sources of Architectural Design Ideation A Reflection on the Ideation Process of Eight Iranian Professional Architects. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 17(2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2012.30155
Naser Khaki, H. (2009). Role of Computers in Architectural Design Process; A comparative comparison of two generations of contemporary Iranian architects [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran]. https://noordoc.ir/thesis/14325‬
‏Nouri, M., Azizi, Sh., & Mousapour, M. Y. (2021). Explaining the role of metaphor and analogy techniques in the architectural design process: Problem-understanding and Problem-solving. Hoviatshahr, 15(3), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.16034
Olia, Sh., Habib, F., & Shahcheraghi, A. (2022). Exploring the Place of Nature Strategies in Architecture Design Process Towards Nature and Built Environment Symbiosis. Creative City Design, 4(5), 70-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30495/ccd.2022.698494 
Onians, J. (1992). Architecture, Metaphor and the Mind. Architectural History, 35, 192-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1568576 
Rezaei, M. (2014a). Design Analytica: Reviewing Theories and Concepts in Contemporary Design Process of Form and Space. Islamic Azad University Press.
Rezaei, M. (2014b). Design Process (Decoding “Analogy” as a Major Method of Form and Space Producing). Hoviatshahr, 8(18), 71-80.
Rezaei, M. (2020). Reviewing Design Process Theories: Discourses in Architecture, Urban Design and Planning Theories. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61916-9
Rezvani, A. (2014). Functional classification of methods and introduction of seven architectural design processes. The article presented in the first national conference on research methods in urban planning and architecture. Yazd University.
Sabri, R. C. (2014). Evolution in design: myths and images in design process. Parham Naqsh.
Shariatrad, F., & Nadimi, H. (2016). Problem Framing: The Designer’s Way of Tackling Design Problems. Soffeh, 26(3), 5-24. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100321.html?lang=en
Snyder, J. C., McGinty, T. L., & Catanese, A. J. (1979). Introduction to architecture. McGraw-Hill.