Abbaszadeh Diz, F., Rashid Koliver, H., & Rezaei Sharif, A. (2019). Analysis of student satisfaction from physical components of school with an emphasis on cooperative learning case study: Boys› secondary schools in Tabriz. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 11(23), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2019.714 
Abbaszadeh Diz, F., Rashid Kolvir, H., & Rezaeisharif, A. (2020). Identifying the components of school physical environment with participatory learning approach (case study: Boys’ middle schools of Tabriz). Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 14(2), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4600.2091
Alexander, C. (1997). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford Univercity Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/A_Pattern_Language.html?id=hwAHmktpk5IC 
Amunts, J., Camilleri, J. A., Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., & Weis, S. (2020). Executive functions predict verbal fluency scores in healthy participants. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 11141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65525-9 
Ardila, A. (2008). On the evolutionary origins of executive functions. Brain and Cognition, 68(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.03.003 
Arghiani, M., & Shakeri, M. (2021). The role of built environments in student interactions at school. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 13(33), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.155800.1734 
Ashworth, F., Brennan, G., Egan, K., Hamilton, R., and Sáenz, O. (2004). Learning theories and higher education. Dublin Instit. Techn., 3, 1–16.  https://eprints.teachingandlearning.ie/id/eprint/1728/ 
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 40, 518-529. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220017441_Student_Involvement_A_Development_Theory_for_Higher_Education 
Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S.I. Donaldson, D.E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise ofapplied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers. Erlbaum.
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils› learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118- 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013 v
Bayramnejad, H., Yarahmadi, Y., Ahmadian, H., & Akbari, M. (2021). Developing of school satisfaction model based on perception of classroom environment and perception of teacher support mediated by academic buoyancy and academic engagement. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 8(3), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.30473/etl.2021.55255.3321 
Beattie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392897331587
Biggs, J. B. & Moore, P. J. (1993). The process of learning (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.
Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Cloonan, A., Dixon, M., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Senior, K. (2012). Innovative learning environments research study. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307981753_Innovative_learning_environments_research_study 
Bloom, B. S. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. McKay. 
Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. Academic Press. 
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (1991 ASHE ERIC Higher Education Reports). ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049 
Booth, P. & Luckett, P. & Mladenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education, 8(4), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392899330801 
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748 
Byers, T. & Imms, W. & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5-h19. http://doi.org/10.7459/ct/29.1.02 
Byers, T. & Imms, W. & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Evaluating teacher and student spatial transition from a traditional classroom to an innovative learning environment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.004
Celce-Murcia, M & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3, 7. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi7oPmTgt6MAxWuZ_EDHXCiB6kQFnoECCEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2ZKjtP42rR7TMOmBVcsgEX
Ching, F.D.K. (2014). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=ATazEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false 
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
Cleveland, B. & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3 
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 43–77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 
Dai, Z. & Xiong, J. & Zhao, L. & Zhu, X. (2023). Smart classroom learning environment preferences of higher education teachers and students in China: An ecological perspective. Heliyon, 9(6), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16769 
Dejene, W., Bishaw, A., & Dagnew, A. (2018). Preservice teachers’ approaches to learning and their teaching approach preferences: Secondary teacher education program in focus. Cogent Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1502396
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 
Duffy, F. (1992). The Changing Workplace. Phaidon Press.
Eskandari Torbaghan, Z., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Kamelnia, H. (2020). A conceptual framework for designing the physical space of the primary schools based on the collaborative learning theory. Journal of Educational Innovations, 18(72), 27–52. https://www.sid.ir/paper/75361/en#downloadbottom 
Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., & Maussen, S. (2017). The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Accounting Education, 26(1), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911 
Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. University of Oklahoma, 27(11), 1-33. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2014/03/www.deefinkandassociates.com_GuidetoCourseDesignAug05.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjVo8-J_uCMAxVxGxAIHTroFdcQFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ekq7a72ITE9y0B9uEx_f8 
Fisher, K. (2005). Linking pedagogy and space. Victoria University Australia: Department of Education and Training. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.education.vic.gov.au/documents/school/principals/infrastructure/pedagogyspace.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiy3YOziN6MAxX1_rsIHTI2INYQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3yyYSbI4jqF0nkf7Dy1iTv 
Floyd, K. S., Harrington, S., & Santiago, J. (2009). The effect of engagement and perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Informing Science, 12, 181. http://doi.org/10.28945/435 
Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078612331378451
Fredricks, J. A. & Blumenfeld, P. C. & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engage- ment: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educa- tional Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 
Fullan, M., Quinn, J. & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.
Ghaemi, F., Rostami, R., Mirkamali, S. M., & Salehi, K. (2021). Systematic and analytical review of theories, components and models of executive functions of the brain. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 10(6), 211-g226. https://frooyesh.ir/browse.php?a_id=2509&slc_lang=en&sid=1&printcase=1&hbnr=1&hmb=1 
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218 
Ha, J. & Kim, H. J. (2021). The restorative effects of campus landscape biodiversity: Assessing visual and auditory perceptions among university students. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127259. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127259 
Hacisalihoglu, G., Stephens, D., Johnson, L., and Edington, M. (2018). The use of an active learning approach in a SCALE-UP learning space improves academic performance in undergraduate general biology. PLoS One 13(5), e0197916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197916 
Halim, A., & Mustar, Y. S. (2017). U-Shape Design in Teaching: EngagingNon-English Speaking Country Studentsin Learning English. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 9) (pp. 37-f41). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/conaplin-16/25874123 
Hall, M.& Ramsay, A. & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first year accounting students. Accounting Education, 13(4), 489–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000306837 
Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A Study Exploring Learners’ Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.740961
He, T. & Hu, X. (2022). A review of deep learning research in the past two decades at home and abroad. Journal of Simulation, 10(3), 23-26. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3442200 
Holec, V. & Marynowski, R. (2020). Does it matter where you teach? Insights from a quasi-experimental study of student engagement in an active learning classroom. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, 8(2), 140-h164. http://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.10 
Huang, S., & Xu, L. (2017). A PreIiminary Study of the DeveIopment and AppIication of Research on Healing Environment and HeaIing Architecture. Archit. Cult, 10, 101-h104.
Jamieson, P. (2009). The serious matter of informal learning. Planning For Higher Education, 37(2), 18. https://www.proquest.com/docview/212626213?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals 
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory›s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028089
Jin, S., & Peng, L. (2022). Classroom perception in higher education: The impact of spatial factors on student satisfaction in lecture versus active learning classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941285
Kahu, E. R. (2011). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kepez, O., & Üst, S. (2022). Furniture configurations in an active learning classroom make further differences in student outcomes. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 18(1), 121-g141. http://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-06-2022-0132 
Kohlberg, L. (1971). Stages of moral development as a basis for moral education. Center for Moral Education, Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442656758-004
Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children›s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153
Lang, J. T. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Science in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Li, B., Kong, S.C, Chen, G. (2015). Development and validation of the smart classroom inventory. Smart Learning Environment. 2(3), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0012-0
Liang, H., Wang, X., Wang, S., Chen, Z., & Gao, X. (2023). International research progress and enlightenment of healing- oriented university campus supportive environment construction based on knowledge mapping analysis. New Architecture, 1–16.
Llorens, S. & Wilmar, S. & Arnold, B. & Marisa, S. (2007). Does a Positive Gain Spiral of Resources, Efficacy Beliefs and Engagement Exist?. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825–841. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012 
Llorens-Gámez, M. & Higuera-Trujillo, J. L. & Omarrementeria, C. S. & Llinares, C. (2022). The impact of the design of learning spaces on attention and memory from a neuroarchitectural approach: A systematic review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(3), 542–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.002 
Lotfata, A. (2008). Effect of environmental factors on behaviors and learning, in educational spaces (especially elementary schools). Modiriyat Shahri, 21, 73–90. Retrieved from https://www.sid.ir/paper/91958/en#downloadbottom 
Mahat, M., & Emery, M. (2024). Spatial and furniture configurations: The impact on teacher mind frames and student deep learning. In J. E. Morris & W. Imms (Eds.), Teachers as researchers in innovative learning environments: Case studies from Australia and New Zealand schools (pp. 91–105). Springer Nature Singapore.
Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2021). The Space Design and Use survey: Establishing a reliable measure of educators’ perceptions of the use of learning environments. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 145-d164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00382-z 
Majeski, R., & Stover, M. (2007). Theoretically Based Pedagogical Strategies Leading to Deep Learning in Asynchronous Online Gerontology Courses. Educational Gerontology, 33(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270600850826
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to Learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning. Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education (2nd ed., pp. 39-h58). Scottish Academic Press. 
Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.14 
McAndrew, F. T. (1993). Environmental psychology. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0517
McCloskey, G. & Perkins, L.A. (2012). Essentials of Executive Functions Assessment. Wiley. 
McCloskey, G. (2016). McCloskey Executive Functions Scale (MEFS): Professional Manual. Schoolhouse Educational Services, LLC.
McCloskey, G., Perkins, L. A., & Van Divner, B. (2009). Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=0Zay3OyWU9oC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Meng, D. C., & Xu, L. Q. (2023). Place Attachment and Healing Environment: A Study on the Relationship Between Positive Emotions and Spatial Types During Campus Closure. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 11(2), 10-g32. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-1-020077 
Mohammadi, A., & Mohammadi, J. (2013). Students› perception of the learning environment at Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Medical Education Development, 6(11), 50-60. http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-131-en.html 
Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B. W., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128 
Murphy, D. J. (2020). Relationships between innovative learning environments, teacher mind frames and deep learning [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Melbourne]. The University of Melbourne Library.
Nair, P., & Fielding, R. (2005). The Language of School Design - Design Patterns for 21st Century Schools.  National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
Nejati, V. (2010). Cognitive-executive functions of brain frontal lobe in aged adults. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4(1), 59-64. https://www.behavsci.ir/article_67668.html 
OECD (2015). Schooling redesigned: Towards innovative learning systems. OECD.
 Pearson, M. M., & Harvey, D. P. II (2013). Cognitive science: How do deep approaches to learning promote metacognitive strategies to enhance integrated learning? Faculty Research and Creative Activity, 31, 60–65. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/eemedu_fac/31
Phillips, R., McNaught, C., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Towards a generalised conceptual framework for learning: The learning environment, learning processes and learning outcomes (LEPO) framework. In J. Herrington & W. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010 (pp. 2495–2504). AACE.
Pintrich, PR. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92- 104. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017 
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). https://books.google.com/books/about/Understanding_Learning_And_Teaching.html?id=2UHlAAAAQBAJ 
Reeve, J. (2013). How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032690 
Ritter, F. E., Baxter, G. D., & Churchill, E. F. (2014). Cognition: Memory, attention, and learning. In F. E. Ritter, G. D. Baxter, & E. F. Churchill (Eds.), Foundations for designing user-centered systems (pp. 123–164). Springer.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem‐based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
Schlechty, P. C. (2005). Creating Great Schools: Six Critical Systems at the Heart of Educational Innovation. Jossey-Bass.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). Routledge. 
Talkhabi, M., Pourtakdoust, S., Piryaei, S., Mohammadi Azad, K., Karbaschian, R., Rezazadeh, N., Shariati, S., Sebghati, A., Bandali, G., Rafiei, F., & Mehrad, M. (2020). راهنمای تدوین بسته پرورش مهارت‌‌های شناختی [Guideline for developing cognitive skills training packages]. Engare.
Tanner, C. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373598 
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Springer US.
Velusamy, R. (2022). Transitional Space in Tertiary Institutions as Informal Lerning Space Towards 21st Century Education [Doctoral dissertation, University Sains Malaysia]. Researchgate. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.92007
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=RxjjUefze_oC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false 
Withagen, R., De Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G. J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250-258 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003 
Wu, X., & Oldfield, P. & Heath, T. (2020). Spatial openness and student activities in an atrium: A parametric evaluation of a social informal learning environment. Building and Environment, 182, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107141 
Zhao, G. (2015). Research on Curriculum Design of Deep Learning based on the WeChat. In 3rd International Conference on Management Science, Education Technology, Arts, Social Science and Economics (pp. 1056-f1061). Atlantis Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2